slide 9 to 15 of 15

Boo-hoo: In revisiting Bill Clinton, liberals argue he paid for his, um, 'indiscretions'

We certainly noticed it, and The Federalist did too; that is, the sudden glut of think pieces suggesting that Americans, and especially Democrats, really need to make a reckoning with the charges made against former President Bill Clinton. It’s awfully difficult to call out the hypocrisy of Roy Moore supporters while trying to hold up Clinton’s shaky legacy.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/molratty/status/930784469136609280

The piece by David Harsanyi is well worth a read, but what really caught our attention is the same thing that has with every one of these think pieces on Clinton — people seem to think he was punished for his “indiscretions.”

He didn’t just skip away? That’s kind of exactly what he did, if you ask around a bit.

https://twitter.com/themanfronUNCLE/status/930794118950813696

Advertisement

So he was “kind of” punished?

You are correct, sir. Ask Juanita Broaddrick or Kathleen Wiley if they think Clinton was punished on their behalf.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/RachaelTDeckard/status/930920441979506689

* * *

Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos