Skin Grifting: Texas Democrat Jolanda Jones Says James Talarico Needs to Pay Blacks...
Radial Ratio: Texas Dem’s Tired Idea of ICE Agent Self-Defense Against Moving Vehicles...
Marco Rubio Blocks Tim Walz's Illegal Pardon, Newsom Froze Like Deer In Headlights
Sayonara, Sex Offender: Marco Rubio Reminds Tim Walz What Protecting Americans Looks Like
Orca Orchestrations: Hollywood’s ‘Reimagining’ of ‘Free Willy’ Has Movie Fans Wailing with...
Scott Jennings Just Needs 1 Post to Shut Conspiracy Nuts Attacking America/Israel's Allian...
Hakeem Jeffries Is Getting Help Deciphering What His Opposition to the SAVE Act...
Gavin Newsom Is a Lying Sack of SNOT. In Other News, Water Is...
She's Gonna BLOW! Ana Navarro Completely UNRAVELS When Asked to Name 1 American...
Rep. Ilhan Omar Was Eager to Answer Questions About Huge Financial Disclosure Revisions...
Oh, HONEY: X Points and LAUGHS As Maine Dems Pretend They're SUPER DUPER...
Bats**t ISN'T a Good Look? Who Knew? Megyn Kelly Suddenly Calling Out Kirk...
Maine Senate Hopeful Troy Jackson Is Trying the 'Man's Man' Approach and it's...
BOOM --> DataRepublican Takes on Candace Owens and Her Horde of CRAZY After...
Ro Khanna's Pro-Platner Timeline (Including All the Hypocrisy and Projection) 'Is Sociopat...

Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein cautions against anonymous sources in bizarre, strange, curious statement

Whatever it is that’s going on right now — a criminal investigation of President Trump for obstruction of justice, perhaps — took an interesting twist when Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein issued a statement Thursday night cautioning Americans against stories attributed to anonymous officials … which would include just about every story published since January or so.

Advertisement

The very best part of the statement, though, was the way it managed to send journalists searching for that perfect word to describe it. What could Rosenstein mean, “be skeptical about anonymous allegations”?

Advertisement

That makes two votes for “bizarre,” one for “curious,” one for “interesting,” two for “strange,” one for “odd” … and add a late entry for “super odd.”

This is weird … all of the usual suspects are wondering why Rosenstein would issue a caution about believing anonymous sources. Which reporter is getting ready to drop tomorrow’s anonymously sourced 5 p.m. bombshell and isn’t telling?

https://twitter.com/celestemc/status/875530186799939584

https://twitter.com/Leadback_/status/875528389909659648

We’ll have to see. As strange as the statement might seem, it’s nice that there was a name attached to it in case anyone has questions.

Advertisement

 

* * *

Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement