Obviously, Hillary Clinton is quite a bit older now than when we got to know her as first lady and learned her penchant for blaming her and her husband’s scandals on a “vast right-wing conspiracy.” Many of Clinton’s original gatekeepers are still around to protect her from media scrutiny, but they’re now augmented by even more journalists happy to let the public know when they’ve crossed into “hater” territory with all of their pesky questions.
Bloomberg Politics managing editor Mark Halperin, for example, knows that Hillary Clinton is right about one thing.
.@HillaryClinton has a lot to explain but 1 thing she is right about: nothing will be good enough for the Clinton haters, incl in the media
— Mark Halperin (@MarkHalperin) March 10, 2015
.@MarkHalperin Yes this whole thing is clearly their fault.
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) March 10, 2015
Hi @MarkHalperin What will be good enough for you? @HillaryClinton
— Keep Calm and Carry (@johnnyfriegas) March 10, 2015
Those poor, poor Clintons. They're so powerless and abused. @MarkHalperin @HillaryClinton
— Melissa Mackenzie ? (@MelissaTweets) March 10, 2015
https://twitter.com/jfgroves/status/575087356216279040
https://twitter.com/Tark31/status/575087441964462080
https://twitter.com/infosecdev/status/575087521371197441
https://twitter.com/Tark31/status/575087533555482624
@MarkHalperin Really? This is your takeaway from this whole affair? @MelissaTweets @HillaryClinton
— Michael Blum (@MichaelBlum3) March 10, 2015
https://twitter.com/RyanLGustafson/status/575087671002816512
We’ll just have to wait and see. That’s a journalist’s job, right?
@MarkHalperin @Rogue_Beaver @HillaryClinton At this point? Well, yeah- because there is no excuse for this email scheme.
— Gerry Daly (@GerryDales) March 10, 2015
https://twitter.com/Matthops82/status/575087763382370304
@redsteeze Mr. Halperin fails to understand the Clintons are wholly untrustworthy. @ReeseDelaney @MarkHalperin
— Sheryl #rescue #loveofcountry (@sav01) March 10, 2015
https://twitter.com/alwaysonoffense/status/575087855149674496
@MarkHalperin Therefore anyone who doesn’t buy her coming “explanation” is by her/your(?) definition a “hater”? Self-serving assertion.
— Grover Norquist (@GroverNorquist) March 10, 2015
https://twitter.com/michi83/status/575088147517816832
https://twitter.com/bfinstock/status/575088192065380352
https://twitter.com/jfgroves/status/575088203897634817
@MarkHalperin She dug this hole herself. Only way out is to hand over the server-and have a neutral party examine it.
— Lakelady (@marthamkb) March 10, 2015
@MarkHalperin @MelissaTweets 'Clinton haters' – those who notice that the Clintons are arrogant, mendacious corruptocrats.
— Skin that smokewagon! (@heatpacker) March 10, 2015
@MarkHalperin They deserve NO benefit of the doubt. What's wrong with you?
— Cooper's mom (@rwgranny) March 10, 2015
.@MarkHalperin @HillaryClinton Wait, people are hurting your feel bads because the Clintons are up to their usual law-breaking?
— Vulpes vulpes (@Oenonewept) March 10, 2015
What do you think your job is, exactly? https://t.co/O032D8rhMI @MarkHalperin @HillaryClinton
— RBe (@RBPundit) March 10, 2015
@redsteeze @MarkHalperin Doncha just hate the haters….putting those emails on a private server….and stuff.
— Ig (@Ig_Bricker) March 10, 2015
https://twitter.com/CaseyMattoxADF/status/575092868349587456
https://twitter.com/jfgroves/status/575097299224948737
See? You are just a bunch of Clinton haters.
I don't know which is greater: the predictability of the Clinton haters or the level of their vitriol. As I said, she has a lot to explain
— Mark Halperin (@MarkHalperin) March 10, 2015
That's the real story here. MT @MarkHalperin Don't know which is greater: the predictability of Clinton haters or the level of their vitriol
— jon gabriel (@exjon) March 10, 2015
https://twitter.com/MarkMMcClain/status/575093525416640512
@MarkHalperin What an embarrassing comment. None of her "haters" had anything to do with her actions.
— Melanie (@mrussRSF) March 10, 2015
https://twitter.com/jfgroves/status/575093662947885056
https://twitter.com/seanagnew/status/575096033803370496
@exjon @MarkHalperin I don’t know which is greater; the predictability of you protecting Hillary or the length you will go to do it.
— Mark The Shark (@MRaff57) March 10, 2015
.@MarkHalperin I could give an example of something even more predictable. Spoiler alert: it involves you.
— John Ekdahl (@JohnEkdahl) March 10, 2015
https://twitter.com/dangainor/status/575098415559892993
I want the public to see @hillaryclinton email. State should explain it all. They should say they will as soon as possible. #ClintonClassic
— Mark Halperin (@MarkHalperin) March 10, 2015
Why would you possibly want to see Hillary Clinton’s emails, hater?
Join the conversation as a VIP Member