Jim Acosta Is Mad Trump’s Name Going Back Up on Kennedy Center, Wants...
They Would Know: Nick Freitas and Spencer Pratt Tell Us EXACTLY What Happened...
‘Hurt People Hurt People’? Cool Story, Bro: MI Jews Build a Coalition to...
Dad, It's Just ISIS: SNL Got It Right Spoofing White College Age Leftist...
'No One Should Be Jailed for Stealing Toothpaste' — Peak Progressive Brainrot From...
Chelsea Handler Warns That Todd Blanche Will Overturn Roe v. Wade As Attorney...
Chris Matthews Loses It on 'Morning Joe' As Democrat Party Starts Fracturing
Vets BODY Mark Kelly for BS'ing About 'Grandma' Calling Him About Her POOR...
HA! Jacob Frey Busts a Move at Black Entrepreneur State Fair and the...
Biden Would Be Proud: Abigail Spanberger Has Never Met a Photo Op She...
Gavin Newsom and Gretchen Whitmer Try to Convince Each Other They Made the...
White Lotus Tried Making a Republican Woman Look Stupid and Boy HOWDY Did...
About That Poor, Innocent, 'WHITE' Loudoun County Woman ICE Pulled a Gun on...
'I Thought Football Was Slavery': Let's Check on How Abdul El-Sayed's Sports Pivot...
YUP, Abdul El-Sayed's Terror-Supporting Sis Is Nuts — INSANE Thread Shows We Ain't...

Gawker article takes sympathetic look at pedophiles; outraged readers suggest #GawkersNextArticle

Fox News analyst Kirsten Powers is only one of many who are “super troubled” by an article published yesterday by Gawker which takes a sympathetic look at pedophiles. And by “sympathetic,” we mean depraved.

Advertisement

The morally bankrupt article, written by Gawker editor and self-described progressive Cord Jefferson, is titled “Born This Way: Sympathy and Science for Those Who Want to Have Sex with Children.” It begins with a graphic account of sex with a 7-year-old girl — not rape, not molestation, but “sex.” It ends with a plea for understanding of this particular “sexual orientation”:

The old adage is that the true mark of a society is how it treats the weakest in its ranks. Blacks, women, Latinos, gays and lesbians, and others are still in no way on wholly equal footing in America. But they’re also not nearly as lowly and cursed as men attracted to children. One imagines that if Jesus ever came to Earth, he’d embrace the poor, the blind, the lepers, and, yes, the pedophiles.

While the revolting article appears under Gawker’s “Science” banner, many are outraged by the overall tone of the piece, which forgoes use of the terms “rape” and “assault” with only two exceptions: when describing threats made against pedophiles; for example, “Outside of jail, it’s not uncommon for average citizens to harass and assault pedophiles.”

Advertisement

Advertisement

So, what’s the point of trying to prove that pedophilia is just another sexual orientation with which one is born? “If this research proves to be correct,” writes Jefferson, “it should help shape both our public policy and our public attitude, so that we’re protecting kids while also protecting pedophiles from angry mobs, cellmates, and themselves.”

https://twitter.com/ToddKincannon/status/244571117744959488

With no attempt to even hide its agenda, Gawker inspired the #GawkersNextArticle hashtag. Just how low can you lower the bar while keeping the progressive language highbrow?

https://twitter.com/AiPolitics/status/244581120589570048

https://twitter.com/ChrisBarnhart/status/244585551829815296

https://twitter.com/ToddKincannon/status/244599008293711873

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/Imaumbn/status/244600184456245248

https://twitter.com/ToddKincannon/status/244601854502244352

Sad, but not at all hard to believe:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement