Annnnnnnd Hillary Clinton’s delusional horribleness continues apace:
NPR asked if Clinton would rule out questioning legitimacy of 2016, pending Russia probe
CLINTON: “No I would not"https://t.co/azSFhnWaJY
— Aaron Blake (@AaronBlake) September 18, 2017
— The Hill (@thehill) September 18, 2017
Because of course she refuses:
“No, I wouldn’t rule it out,” she said in an interview with NPR published Monday.
The defeated Democratic nominee stressed, however, that she does not believe there is a means to officially challenge the election’s outcome.
“I don’t know if there’s any legal, constitutional way to do that,” Clinton said. “I think you can raise questions.”
More from her interview with NPR’s Terry Gross:
Now, I do believe we should abolish the Electoral College, because I was sitting listening to a report on the French election and the French political analyst said, “You know in our country the person with the most votes wins, unlike in yours.” And I think that’s an anachronism. I’ve said that since 2000.
Well, if nothing else, she can count on Peter Daou’s support. And these people’s:
#Please YES !!!
— Barbara Navarro ❄️ (@BarbaraNavarro) September 18, 2017
??Here's hoping she does!!!!
— Don Selmon (@don_selmon) September 18, 2017
I AM WITH HER
— Jo Ann Hogan (@Jhogan552) September 18, 2017
Right behind ya!
— Shannon (@Cowboyzion01) September 18, 2017
— SW Blue (@SMBlue63) September 18, 2017
OMG…please @HillaryClinton . We are behind you 100%. OMG would it not be wonderful if she were our president. We would LIVE again!!!!!
— Ann (@alf27900) September 18, 2017
"We would LIVE again!!!!!!" https://t.co/ptb0ibBaum
— Bee ? (@infobee) September 18, 2017
So there’s that, at least.
— EducatédHillbilly™ (@RobProvince) September 18, 2017
— Alex Hall (@AMomentwithAlex) September 18, 2017
She’ll never let it go. She is physically incapable of letting it go.
Say, remember when undermining the legitimacy was the worst thing a candidate could do? https://t.co/0ZNKv6b4Gi
— Ed Morrissey (@EdMorrissey) September 18, 2017
'Member when Hillary and Democrats went nuts after Trump said he wasn't sure he'd accept the results?
I 'member. https://t.co/2whyOFuTRG
— Drew McCoy (@_Drew_McCoy_) September 18, 2017
We ‘member, too.
Same woman who insisted Trump and Republicans must accept results of our election when she thought she had it bought. Smh…
— C.S, Rivershark Art (@riversharkart) September 18, 2017
— Jason (@CounterMoonbat) September 18, 2017
— Elizabeth Harrington (@LizWFB) September 18, 2017
Not accepting election results is "a direct threat to our democracy."
-Hillary Clinton October 24, 2016 https://t.co/pobWjDavEN
— The Reagan Battalion (@ReaganBattalion) September 18, 2017
It’s almost as if her respect for election outcomes is conditional or something.
Delegitimizating the peaceful transfer of power is the highest form of patriotism. https://t.co/FpiQbxHfpL
— Randy Barnett (@RandyEBarnett) September 18, 2017
Look, if we're going to start holding politicians accountable by using their very own words the whole system pretty much breaks down.
— Jay Cadmus (@jaycadmus) September 18, 2017
Ha! Fair enough.
It will be newsworthy when a Democrat does accept an election loss. https://t.co/qBfXuYl34f
— BT (@back_ttys) September 18, 2017
Sore losers who challenge elections are a direct threat to our democracy. https://t.co/U4bWiCGep9
— Razor (@hale_razor) September 18, 2017
Sore losers who challenge elections and have zero self-awareness are even worse. From that same NPR interview:
“In fact, I think part of the reason Trump behaves the way he behaves is that he is a walking example of projection. Whatever he’s doing and whatever he thinks is happening he will accuse somebody else of.”
Spoken like a true projection artist.