Annnnnnnd Hillary Clinton’s delusional horribleness continues apace:

Because of course she refuses:

“No, I wouldn’t rule it out,” she said in an interview with NPR published Monday.

The defeated Democratic nominee stressed, however, that she does not believe there is a means to officially challenge the election’s outcome.

“I don’t know if there’s any legal, constitutional way to do that,” Clinton said. “I think you can raise questions.”

More from her interview with NPR’s Terry Gross:

Now, I do believe we should abolish the Electoral College, because I was sitting listening to a report on the French election and the French political analyst said, “You know in our country the person with the most votes wins, unlike in yours.” And I think that’s an anachronism. I’ve said that since 2000.

Well, if nothing else, she can count on Peter Daou’s support. And these people’s:

Oh.

So there’s that, at least.

She’ll never let it go. She is physically incapable of letting it go.

We ‘member, too.

It’s almost as if her respect for election outcomes is conditional or something.

Ha! Fair enough.

Sore losers who challenge elections and have zero self-awareness are even worse. From that same NPR interview:

“In fact, I think part of the reason Trump behaves the way he behaves is that he is a walking example of projection. Whatever he’s doing and whatever he thinks is happening he will accuse somebody else of.”

Spoken like a true projection artist.