No shit, Sherlocks. https://t.co/LAeGufWpaj
— Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) May 23, 2017
Give the Washington Post a hand, everybody. Just make sure that hand’s wearing an oven mitt, because this take on yesterday’s deadly terrorist attack in Manchester is steaming-hot:
The targeting of women and girls in Manchester may have been intentional https://t.co/K71B9GNtwq
— Washington Post (@washingtonpost) May 23, 2017
Intentional? The devil, you say!
ACE REPORTING HERE https://t.co/iJ2rFlsj22
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) May 23, 2017
@washingtonpost Great investigative journalism.
— Kevin (@kevinm127) May 23, 2017
@washingtonpost My God. I believe you cracked the case!
— THE Arizona Luke (@ArizonaLuke) May 23, 2017
@washingtonpost Did "unnamed sources" leak this bit of news to you?
— TimothyCapwell (@TimothyCapwell) May 23, 2017
@washingtonpost with that keen analysis, better get that Pulitzer speech ready
— Hector Vargas (@TheHectorVargas) May 23, 2017
@washingtonpost Thanks!!!! I was under the wrong impression Islamic terrorism was by accident 😑
— irj (@ijaycole) May 23, 2017
What are "articles that don't need to be written because DUH," Alex? https://t.co/sH9BxdD73L
— RBe (@RBPundit) May 23, 2017
Thanks, Captain Obvious. JFC. https://t.co/7YrGyDVXZo
— Heather (@hboulware) May 23, 2017