This is the exact same number of people who were killed by lightning in 2013. How does Weather Channel defend that? https://t.co/d6WXpBvzCa
— Caleb Howe (@CalebHowe) May 2, 2016
@Salon Based on your logic do you blame the builders of the Golden Gate Bridge for all the suicides there?
— Foghorn Leghorn (@FoghornBLeghorn) May 2, 2016
Salon gonna Salon:
How does the NRA defend this? At least 23 people have been shot by toddlers so far this year https://t.co/E1cosRmNSr
— Salon.com (@Salon) May 2, 2016
And?
They don't, because this has nothing to do with the NRA. https://t.co/jRv13unXGF
— Kimberly (@SouthernKeeks) May 2, 2016
@Salon
Nothing to do with the NRA, sorry— Mr Breeze (@HydroTech12) May 2, 2016
But the NRA is such a convenient scapegoat!
Hi @Salon, can you show me where @NRA has advocated gun possession by toddlers? I can't seem to find it. https://t.co/SiRNH0s8Se
— Mr. ✘ (@GlomarResponder) May 2, 2016
The NRA doesn't defend this, you imbeciles. They're a gun safety organization. @Salonhttps://t.co/NSfmRE4yb1
— Eric Spencer (@JustEric) May 2, 2016
Um, the NRA doesn't defend people who ignore the safety guidelines they teach. Nice try though: https://t.co/OLBtUmC3cl
— Doug Powers (@ThePowersThatBe) May 2, 2016
They say that if @nra safety rules were followed, none of these incidents would have happened https://t.co/R4KnaCpZmb
— Greg Pollowitz (@GPollowitz) May 2, 2016
You mean the NRA isn’t actively trying to arm homicidal toddlers?
@Salon I'm against Guns and violence but my guess is that they blame terrible parenting, and so do I. We all should. #PersonalResponsibility
— Equalist Wolf (@EqualistWolf) May 2, 2016
Parting food for thought, lefty-logic-style:
@Salon just think, only if those 23 toddlers were aborted, tragedy could have been avoided
— Darth #NeverTrumpius (@jameslfregosi) May 2, 2016
