As Twitchy told you, David Axelrod appears to have taken a “not so subtle” swipe at Hillary over reports that she’s considering a “staff shakeup.”
But John Podesta would like to make something perfectly clear:
There is zero truth to what you may be reading. It's wrong. Hillary stands behind her team, period.
— John Podesta (@johnpodesta) February 8, 2016
Got that?
.@johnpodesta pic.twitter.com/yUqEWQj2em
— Matthew (@Matthops82) February 8, 2016
.@johnpodesta pic.twitter.com/G3xO3Y6mGo
— Countermoonbat (@CounterMoonbat) February 8, 2016
LOL! RT @johnpodesta: There is zero truth to what you may be reading. It's wrong. Hillary stands behind her team, period.
— Jimmy (@JimmyPrinceton) February 8, 2016
@johnpodesta hahahaha
— jp (@JohnPlatner) February 8, 2016
Don’t laugh! He means it, you guys.
@johnpodesta Least reassuring tweet ever.
— Victory Gin (@DrinkVictory) February 8, 2016
This is the athletic director's dreaded "vote of confidence" with a month left to go in the season. https://t.co/hceDYVIG5H
— Zac Gershberg (@DrGersh) February 8, 2016
So, this means house is gonna get cleaned, right? https://t.co/yBweD9URvD
— Josh Mound (@JoshuaMound) February 8, 2016
and when a Clinton gives their word…guess it depends on the meaning of "stand" behind her team cc @HillaryClinton https://t.co/4CGQKUzz5m
— Sean Spicer (@seanspicer) February 8, 2016
"Zero truth to what you MAY be reading" — classic Clintonian wording. Depends on definition of "truth" and "may"… https://t.co/3lQCEB35jM
— Todd Domke (@ToddDomke) February 8, 2016
And she neither sent nor received classified info over her private server. Right. Got it. https://t.co/tt87K0FPfa
— Dave McAlpine (@davidcmcalpine) February 8, 2016
https://twitter.com/kevoNYK/status/696811305169264641
@johnpodesta @ron_fournier That means a bloodbath is imminent.
— #NeverTrump (@HenryLGomez) February 8, 2016
@johnpodesta Well that's a relief. So she'll be going down with the ship then?
— David F Whitten (@DavidFWhitten67) February 8, 2016
***
Related:
‘Not so subtle’: David Axelrod has stinging campaign criticism for (guess who)
