'Get those lapel stars ready!' NYT shows off its handy-dandy 'Jew tracker'

Via @DanFosterType, NYT has a helpful Jew column in its Iran deal roundup http://t.co/uekKumNuBn

— Michael C Moynihan (@mcmoynihan) September 10, 2015

The lawmakers against the Iran nuclear deal http://t.co/WsvuvPoczO pic.twitter.com/7TJaUzqW0Z

— The New York Times (@nytimes) September 10, 2015

*clap*…*clap*…*clap*… pic.twitter.com/bXObEZKzGK

— Brandon Morse (@TheBrandonMorse) September 10, 2015

Jew Tracker 9000 is now my pet name for NYT. https://t.co/P0wDXh7KKf

— Brandon Morse (@TheBrandonMorse) September 10, 2015

My favorite part of the NYT Jew tracker is the part where specifically track how loyal to the political party the Jews are

— Political Math (@politicalmath) September 10, 2015

Ever wonder how loyal to America your Jewish senator is? The NY Times is here to help!

— Seth Mandel (@SethAMandel) September 10, 2015

Oh good a list of politically problematic Jews. This is sure to come in handy. https://t.co/YrB49aljTa

— Lachlan Markay (@lachlan) September 10, 2015

NYT keeping tabs of all those Jews and their Jew-y votes. Never know what Jewery they're up to http://t.co/Fpk8fjaX6v pic.twitter.com/oVhMic2Npu

— Political Math (@politicalmath) September 10, 2015

If you were wondering if Dems take the Jewish vote for granted, look no further than the NY Times list of Jews and Jewy districts.

— Seth Mandel (@SethAMandel) September 10, 2015

@SethAMandel GP And Jewy states, at least in the Senate version.

— The Gormogons (@Gormogons) September 10, 2015

Has the New York Times ever done something analogous with e.g. Black, Latino, Asian, etc. Congressmen? Just Jews? https://t.co/rMw41nLO30

— Lee Doren (@LDoren) September 10, 2015

NYTimes categorizes Senators as Jewish? or Not…for Iran vote. I can't wait for the Gay votes…. http://t.co/eieqMLIQBN

— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) September 10, 2015

WITAF. https://t.co/hNtn6QH6fl

— sarah (@mamaswati) September 10, 2015

@TheBrandonMorse this NYT piece is pretty disgusting. Basically saying only Dem opposition is due to Jewish roots or jew pressure.

— Yaakov Labowitz (@yaakovlabowitz) September 10, 2015

This is a VERY misleading cropping of the list, since majority of lawmakers against the deal on it *aren't* Jewish https://t.co/2i84zpxHHg

— Yair Rosenberg (@Yair_Rosenberg) September 10, 2015

Weird that the NYT decided to sort its list of Iran deal opponents by putting the minority of Jews on top, rather than going alphabetically

— Yair Rosenberg (@Yair_Rosenberg) September 10, 2015

@Yair_Rosenberg @LoriLMarcus It makes them easier to separate on the train platform.

— Roy Abrams (@RQA) September 10, 2015

@nytimes @JewishJournal When did publishing lists of Jews come back into style?

— righteous axe (@righteousaxe) September 10, 2015

@nytimes Yellow marks seems appropriate for the dual-loyalty accusation being implied here.

— Mark Jacobs (@mr_markjacobs) September 10, 2015

.@mr_markjacobs Yeah, we're calling you out, @nytimes. The reason you ONLY put Jews in your box is….?

— Lori LowenthalMarcus (@LoriLMarcus) September 10, 2015

Get those lapel stars ready! @nytimes

— MBC (@MoonbatCatnip) September 10, 2015

@nytimes Have you picked out the stars you want them to wear yet?

— R Thomas (@Plate0fShrimp) September 10, 2015

@nytimes Why didn't you just mark them with the Star of David?

— NewEnglandDevil (@NewEnglandDevil) September 10, 2015

@LoriLMarcus @nytimes is not even trying to hide their institutional antisemitism any longer. Are they that ignorant? @Sulliview

— Mark Jacobs (@mr_markjacobs) September 10, 2015

@nytimes Sick that you're so fixated on whether people are Jewish. I thought we left this kind of thing in the 1940s.

— Julia Kite (@juliakite) September 10, 2015

The New York Times literally printed a list of Jews who did something it didn't like.

— Lee Doren (@LDoren) September 10, 2015

Yyyyup. What a crap show. https://t.co/cDE9rS475X

— Brandon Morse (@TheBrandonMorse) September 10, 2015

@TheBrandonMorse @politicalmath alternately, "All the Jews that's fit to print," because "The Jewspaper of record" could give the wrong idea

— Jason Hart (@jasonahart) September 10, 2015