'Hilarious!' Julia Louis-Dreyfus' 'birthmark' is 'proof' Rolling Stone didn't make historical mistake [pic]

In my defense, “I was in a drunken stupor” #crackexcuse http://t.co/Jo0HgFtpho cc: @RollingStone pic.twitter.com/f7SFgCsHBO

— Julia Louis-Dreyfus (@OfficialJLD) April 8, 2014

Hancock signed Dec. of Independence NOT Constitution.Yet another Mike fuck-up.Dummy.#veep #crackexcuse @VeepHBO @mrmattwalsh [email protected]

— Julia Louis-Dreyfus (@OfficialJLD) April 9, 2014

#TBT John Hancock not part of tattoo.It is a birthmark.1962 photo is proof. Apologies 2 @RollingStone #crackexcuse pic.twitter.com/h9fYXGqBSo

— Julia Louis-Dreyfus (@OfficialJLD) April 10, 2014

Well played MT @OfficialJLD: #TBT John Hancock not part of tattoo. it's a birthmark. Apologies 2 @RollingStone pic.twitter.com/M6bAemXUfD

— Anthony Quintano (@AnthonyQuintano) April 10, 2014

wins Twitter. RT @OfficialJLD: John Hancock not part of tattoo.It is birthmark.1962 photo. @RollingStone pic.twitter.com/zYoXzVXieE

— Rick Klein (@rickklein) April 10, 2014

Ha! Well played. https://t.co/cGoqbuQKP5

— Logan Act Scholar (@JohnEkdahl) April 10, 2014

@OfficialJLD @RollingStone Hilarious!

— Colleen Marie (@crazymcmama) April 10, 2014

@OfficialJLD @RollingStone 2 funny!

— CAROL SAIZ (@Taintedfilms) April 10, 2014

@OfficialJLD @RollingStone another reason you're awesome.

— Caroline Burns (@cburns724) April 10, 2014

marry me. RT @OfficialJLD: John Hancock not part of tattoo.It is birthmark.1962 photo. @RollingStone pic.twitter.com/6OyeceVWO9

— Daniel Foster (@DanFosterType) April 10, 2014