!['Objectively'? This snippet from a WaPo piece on Hillary is 'perfectly wrong in all ways' [screenshot]](https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/tw/images/up/2016/04/keepusingthatword_new-780x456.jpg)
https://twitter.com/Heminator/status/732263989145567232
It’s cute when MSM outlets pretend to be unbiased:
Hahahahahaha @washingtonpost hahahahahahahttps://t.co/SR2S5PzpEw pic.twitter.com/l1s23eku1I
— Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) May 16, 2016
“Objectively offensive,” eh?
https://twitter.com/SethAMandel/status/732264541774594049
@kerpen @washingtonpost Also illustrates obvious grade inflation in HS and college English classes.
— Joseph Spiegel (@joedocbc) May 16, 2016
It is perfectly wrong in all ways. @SethAMandel @washingtonpost
— Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) May 16, 2016
Including this way:
https://twitter.com/jmj1961/status/732209472593088512
Let’s see it again:
@kerpen The Post should not be calling her "objectively offensive" in a news story. That is what it meant to do, right?
— Ramesh Ponnuru (@RameshPonnuru) May 16, 2016
Whoops!