<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>Twitchy</title><link>https://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2020/01/17/the-roots-world-renowned-wypipologist-writes-piece-trashing-nro-contributor-peter-kirsanow-for-criticizing-the-1619-project-whitely-theres-just-one-problem/feed/</link><description>Who Said What</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 11:41:02 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>The Root's 'world-renowned wypipologist' writes piece trashing NRO contributor Peter Kirsanow for criticizing the 1619 Project 'whitely' — there's just one problem</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Peter Kirsanow recently wrote a piece on the controversial 1619 Project for National Review Online. Spoiler alert: Kirsanow is critical of the project, labeling it historical revisionism. He makes a pretty good case for it being just that. But that doesn&amp;#8217;t sit with The Root&amp;#8217;s Michael Harriot, a self-described &amp;#8220;world-renowned wypipologist,&amp;#8221; who is so incensed by Kirsanow&amp;#8217;s criticism that he wrote a piece of his own, rebuking Kirsanow&amp;#8217;s opinion because it&amp;#8217;s so typical of an ignorant racist white person:]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 12:56:37 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Sarah D]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/tw/images/up/2018/01/at-least-you-tried_new.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://twitchy.com/sarahd/2020/01/17/the-roots-world-renowned-wypipologist-writes-piece-trashing-nro-contributor-peter-kirsanow-for-criticizing-the-1619-project-whitely-theres-just-one-problem-n1423699</link></item></channel></rss>