WATCH: As Boston Ponders Reparations, Black Churches Tell White Churches They're 'Coming f...
WI Dem State Senator and Well-Known Shoplifter Claims Nobody 'Deserves' to Be a...
CNN Host’s Segment on the Abortion Pill Doesn't Go Quite As Planned
Hilarious Community Note on Brigitte Gabriel Post Also Shows the Absolute State of...
And YOU'RE Paying! Thread Shows FREEBIES Biden Is Giving Illegals and It's SO...
HA! Megyn Kelly Rubs Salt in Sunny Hostin's WOUND After Coleman Hughes Chewed...
Karine Jean-Pierre Did NOT Want the Press Recording Obama's Media Pep Rally Aboard...
How Do States Further Residents’ 2A Rights Once Constitutional Carry Is Passed?
Horde of Anti-Israel Mouth-Breathing Douchenozzels Disrupts Holocaust Remembrance Day Meet...
Time Again to Play 'NBC News Story or Biden White House Press Release?'
Take the L! Jon Stewart's Attempt at Damage Control After Being Caught Doing...
She SO MAD! LOL! Jim Jordan Dares to Hold Fani Wilis ACCOUNTABLE and...
By DESIGN: Sen. John Kennedy Is Straight-FIRE Going OFF on Biden and Dems...
WATCH: Sonny Hostin's Attempt to Steamroll Coleman Hughes on The View Blows Up...
'It's Really That Bad'! Desperate Biden Campaign Calls in Reinforcements

'Wildly irresponsible': NYT decided it'd be a great idea to publish sensitive information about the whistleblower

As Twitchy told you, Donald Trump suggested that the whistleblower, being “almost a spy,” should maybe be dealt with the way we used to handle “spies and treason.” Great idea, right? Well, the New York Times had a great idea of their own: revealing information about the whistleblower.

Advertisement

More from the New York Times:

Lawyers for the whistle-blower refused to confirm that he worked for the C.I.A. and said that publishing information about him was dangerous.

“Any decision to report any perceived identifying information of the whistle-blower is deeply concerning and reckless, as it can place the individual in harm’s way,” said Andrew Bakaj, his lead counsel. “The whistle-blower has a right to anonymity.”

Well, apparently that’s not up to the whistleblower. It’s up to the New York Times:

Oh, well, in that case …

Advertisement

For the record, Mark Zaid, another attorney representing the whistleblower, isn’t happy with Dean Baquet’s executive decision, either:

Advertisement

Yeah, what could possibly go wrong?

As usual.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos