People Sound Off on AOC's Condemnation of Police Enforcing the Law Against Protesters
Here's What Inspired the Most Catholic President Ever™ Joe Biden to Make the...
Joe Biden Posts a Video of President Donald Trump NOT Saying to Inject...
WATCH the Video That the House the Sergeant at Arms Wants to Fine...
Columbia Going to Remote Learning for the Remainder of the Semester
Biden Tells Huge Crowd of Supporters in Tampa That Florida Is in Play...
What Could POSSIBLY Go Wrong? Ohio-Based Company Introduces Flamethrower Robot Dog
On Truth Social, Trump Assures His Second Term Will Be ‘Vitriolic’ and ‘Vengeful’
Leftist Loser Who Harassed Alec Baldwin LIES About Interaction, Gets Community Note Treatm...
Anti-Trump Media Lawyers Hold Weekly Zoom Call to Discuss Trial
WATCH: Dollar General Employee Could Not Care Less As Customer Harrasses Him for...
WaPo Notes the Uptick of ‘Antiwar’ Protests on Campus
LOL! Watch Election Denier Stacey Abrams Say Attacking DEI Is Attacking Democracy
Trump Prosecutor Used to Be the No. 3 Official at Biden’s DOJ
WATCH: NASA Administrator Bill Nelson Shows He Needs Remedial Astronomy Classes

GOP Sen. Ben Sasse warns that Twitter is setting 'a bad precedent' by banning Jesse Kelly

As Twitchy told you yesterday, Twitter recently suspended — and then permanently banned — Jesse Kelly. For what? Well, they never did say. But we feel pretty comfortable concluding that Kelly is just among the latest in a series of victims of Twitter’s double standard when it comes to acceptable speech.

Advertisement

This afternoon, GOP Sen. Ben Sasse, who himself has been on the receiving end of some of Kelly’s Twitter shots, called Twitter out for helping to set a “bad precedent” when it comes to free speech:

As some tweeters have pointed out in their responses to Sasse, Twitter is a private platform and it’s their prerogative to ban anyone they want to.

Yes, they can. But the issue is not their rules regarding speech; it’s their arbitrary enforcement of those rules.

Advertisement

If Twitter wants to ban users for “hate speech,” or whatever they want to call it, that’s fine. But then they need to clearly define what “hate speech” is and hold everyone to the same standard. Otherwise they’re admitting that they’re guilty of the bias of which they’re being quite credibly accused.

Amen to that.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement