So they released a study that said the risk of contracting long COVID may have (MAY HAVE) been exaggerated due to flawed research ... which you know, MAY have caused people a lot of anxiety and fear.
A lot of UNNECESSARY anxiety and fear that literally broke thousands if not millions of people.
And they needed a friggin' study to tell them this? REALLY?!
The risk of contracting long COVID may have been exaggerated due to flawed research, leading to unnecessarily high levels of anxiety about suffering from it, a new study has suggested https://t.co/UNSVrfC9sw— Sky News (@SkyNews) September 26, 2023
Pardon our French, but no s**t.
Yeah, you know that French was a naughty word even though we totally censored it because YOU probably had the same reaction.
From Sky News:
The risk of contracting long COVID may have been exaggerated due to flawed research, leading to unnecessarily high levels of anxiety about suffering from it, a new study has suggested.
'Major flaws' in the literature on the condition likely exaggerated the true threat of contracting it, the new research argues.
For most people with COVID-19, they feel better within days or weeks, but some can have symptoms for longer than three months.
Fatigue, brain fog, chest pain, and shortness of breath are reported as symptoms by those who have long COVID-19 - which is officially known as post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC).
Now, researchers from the UK, along with Denmark and the USA, say 'many scientific publications' overestimated the prevalence of long COVID because of 'overly broad definitions, lack of control groups, inappropriate control groups, and other methodological flaws'.
We still have people driving alone in their cars WITH THE WINDOWS UP and a mask on ... but you know, it was just flawed literature.
I'm shocked to learn that risk about anything related to covid was exaggerated leading to unwarranted anxiety.— Phil Holloway ✈️ (@PhilHollowayEsq) September 26, 2023
Shocked, I say! pic.twitter.com/ly6MxChCVk
No Way!!!! pic.twitter.com/fdkuOOL4cI— Ryan Rally (@RyanRallyOh) September 26, 2023
RIGHT?! NO WAY!
Are you telling us that the evidence is “flawed” yet again?— Miss Jo (@therealmissjo) September 26, 2023
A bit like the numbers dying “of” covid? Rather than “with” covid?
Who would have believed that another conspiracy theory is true, eh?
You pissed off yet?
Editor's Note: Hi there. I know it's been some time since we changed this up but changing it up now to see if any of you read this far. How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? ALSO, if you are reading this far please sign up for Twitchy VIP and help us continue bringing you the truth, especially the truth Biden and his Big Tech goons don't want us sharing.