The New York Times passed on Deborah Ramirez’s story …

From The New York Times:

In a statement, Judge Kavanaugh denied the allegation from the woman, Deborah Ramirez, and called it “a smear, plain and simple.” The New Yorker did not confirm with other eyewitnesses that Judge Kavanaugh was at the party.

The Times had interviewed several dozen people over the past week in an attempt to corroborate her story, and could find no one with firsthand knowledge. Ms. Ramirez herself contacted former Yale classmates asking if they recalled the incident and told some of them that she could not be certain Mr. Kavanaugh was the one who exposed himself.

C’mon, if the Times can’t support the Left’s narrative with a story like this you KNOW there’s nothing there.

Which explains a lot …

Brit Hume nailed it.

Very telling indeed.


We actually laughed out loud at this one, thanks.

It won’t take that long …

From Twitchy (heh!):

Although it’s not clear if Avenatti’s new client is the same as this woman:

Investigators say it is unclear if Avenatti’s tweet and email is in regards to the same woman they’ve interviewed.

Told ya’.

This has all been stupidly exhausting. True story.



Well, they ARE the experts! Rolling Stone’s tweet on the ‘Kavanaugh narrative’ belongs in the BACKFIRE Hall of Fame

ROFLMAO! Sally Kohn claims ‘prominent conservative man’ asked for her #adviceforgoodmen ANNND we can’t even

HOLY SH*T! Did Ronan Farrow really just throw Senate Dems under the bus about Ramirez?!