Every time we see someone on the Left complaining about how ‘tax cuts’ are going to hurt Americans, we are reminded they are absolutely clueless about where the money government spends comes from.
Luckily we have Brit Hume to explain it in simple terms.
Tax cuts need to be “paid for” only if you believe letting people keep more of their own money is government spending. It’s not.
— Brit Hume (@brithume) October 27, 2017
He might have even used puppets and crayons, we’re not sure.
Tax cuts are reduction of already ongoing theft, not gifts.
— Horst von Horstmann (@Kaboom1776) October 27, 2017
Any tax dollar that is collected which is NOT absolutely necessary is theft.
Period the end.
Exactly right, Brit. The onus isn't on the tax cut to provide the funds, it's on the spending to match the funds provided.
— TehHammer (@SteelSmack) October 27, 2017
Also fair to say the only people who likely oppose tax cuts aren’t spending a whole lot in taxes anyway, and probably don’t want to have to pay THEIR fair share.
Heh.
The idea that tax cuts should be paid for is the biggest thievery of the Federal govt?Live on a budget like the American people have to!!
— TurboChick⭐️⭐️⭐️ (@KelleyTori) October 28, 2017
Recommended
PREACH!
It always ticks me off to hear politicians say that we can keep our own money if it's "paid for." That's bull! IT'S OUR MONEY!!!
— Angela.Kay (@DeepSouthProud) October 27, 2017
PREACH SOME MORE!
https://twitter.com/TAJ2410/status/923982206300770304
Somebody somewhere is paying for it.
https://twitter.com/TruckerBobS/status/924140828720852998
Cut spending!? Crazy talk!
Related:
Great Odin’s RAVEN! Joy Reid’s SPIN on the GOP, Hillary, and Russia may be the SPINNIEST yet
She’s got FAIL: Kamala Harris DREAMer t-shirt tweet goes horribly (HILARIOUSLY) wrong
Join the conversation as a VIP Member