Elizabeth Warren doesn’t support the Trump administration’s actions in Syria. In other news, water is still wet and Hilly Clinton STILL isn’t president.
Apparently Senator Complains-All-Of-The-Time didn’t see any justification in the missile strike – guess photos and footage of dead kids didn’t do it for her:
We need a plan to hold Assad accountable. But so far I’ve seen no compelling strategic justification for Trump's missile strike.
— Elizabeth Warren (@SenWarren) April 8, 2017
As you can imagine, Twitter was none-too-friendly with the whiny senator from Massachusetts …
I thought you'd be happy we attacked them with tomahawks https://t.co/tw1tLv6T6E
— Ben McDonald (@Bmac0507) April 9, 2017
RIGHT!? You’d think she would be happy to see her rich history play a part?
Or maybe that’s why she’s super fussy:
@SenWarren Are you offended we call our missiles Tomahawks.
— Razor (@hale_razor) April 9, 2017
Those MISSILES appropriated her heritage!
@SenWarren Keep it up, Liz. Pretty much everything you ever say ensures the left (you), never winning another election ever again. It's comforting.
— Bill (@BillyBlue37) April 9, 2017
Certainly seems that way.
@SenWarren I know. I mean, it's not like Trump said the use of chemical weapons was a 'red line', right?
— Chris McAllister (@themanfronUNCLE) April 9, 2017
Guess Liz would be happier if Trump had drawn a red line and then wussed out and blamed Congress when Assad crossed it.
Psh, she might as well draw her own red line.
@SenWarren Give another couple of billions to Iran?
— Mujahed Kobbe (@Moj_kobe) April 8, 2017