We’re pretty sure Cecile Richards has the market cornered on disturbing.
Just sayin’.
.@CecileRichards: Confirmation hearings should “probe” Gorsuch’s “disturbing history on women’s issues.” #ThePoint https://t.co/rXoyQCKuSs pic.twitter.com/ze9iMLdS4d
— MSNBC (@MSNBC) March 20, 2017
“Probe his disturbing history on women’s issues” …
Hrm.
Let’s think about what she is really saying here. First of all, she is talking about abortion, not actual rights. Yeah, they love to pretend this is about something else but ultimately abortion is Cecile’s bread and butter. Second, Gorsuch has a history of following the Constitution LITERALLY, which means LIFE is life and a right …
Leave it to Cecile to find life disturbing.
@MSNBC @CecileRichards People who profit by murdering unborn human beings for harvest don't have moral authority to lecture anyone.
— Dixie Red Rocket (@DixieRedRocket) March 20, 2017
Interesting when someone who advocates abortion as contraception tries to wax poetic about moral authority, right?
@MSNBC @CecileRichards Yeah, all that being a judge and not a legislator must really bother Richards…
— just alan (@anythingbutdem) March 20, 2017
Especially a judge who has been known as a literalist when it comes to the Constitution; Cecile knows he won’t buy the “it’s not life until this week” BS that keeps them in business.
@MSNBC @CecileRichards What's disturbing is your history of exploiting women and murdering children. You should probe that.
— P Henry Martin (@PHenryMartin) March 20, 2017
Truth.
@MSNBC @CecileRichards <-this female makes money killing thousands of babies a year. No lower form of human exists on this planet .
— Jacqué Stoddard (@jacquestoddard) March 20, 2017
Ouch.
They would say the same about literally any pro life person. Mother Teresa had a "disturbing history on women's issues" as well. https://t.co/bjdiY2w8yI
— Kayla (@VixenRogue) March 20, 2017
Of course she would because clearly she finds the idea of life disturbing.
