Desperate Clinton is desperate. Or maybe we should say desperate Podesta is desperate. Or just maybe it’s the whole awful group.
First they supported Jill Stein’s recounts (which went nowhere) and now they’re backing 10 electors asking for an intelligence briefing which would prove what we’re not sure.
Remember when Hillary said it would be horrifying for a candidate not to accept the results of the election? Guess John Podesta is the horrifying one … but we already knew that.
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) December 12, 2016
10 Electoral College members wrote a letter and insisted they receive an intelligence briefing around any possible investigations into Russia before next Monday’s meeting. This group of nine Democrats and one Republican wants Trump to personally prove that his campaign did not work with the Russians. From the letter:
“The Electors require to know from the intelligence community whether there are ongoing investigations into ties between Donald Trump, his campaign or associates, and Russian government interference in the election, the scope of those investigations, how far those investigations may have reached, and who was involved in those investigations.”
Per the Washington Examiner, Podesta said, “Each day that month, our campaign decried the interference of Russia in our campaign and its evident goal of hurting our campaign to aid Donald Trump. Despite our protestations, this matter did not receive the attention it deserved by the media in the campaign. We now know that the CIA has determined Russia’s interference in our elections was for the purpose of electing Donald Trump. This should distress every America.”
.@dcexaminer and are these Electors able to receive such an intel briefing? Do they have the security clearance to get this briefing?
— John Angeles (@joshuakarla) December 12, 2016
Excellent question. What makes these folks eligible for such a briefing? Shouldn’t they have a certain type of clearance? Of course Hillary was fine putting a server possibly with national security information IN HER BATHROOM so the idea of ineligible people receiving confidential information doesn’t seem all that worrisome to her or her campaign staff.
Basically what this all boils down to is …
@dcexaminer Hillary Clinton is such a sore loser
— Patriot for Trump (@USPatriot16) December 12, 2016