The New York Times is so adorable, and by adorable we mean ridiculous and annoying. Thanks though, Ian, for posting this snippet of their lame article because it would appear you have to subscribe to read the whole hot mess …

And look out folks, there is CHATTER.

Chatter leads to a rallying cry for Democrats in 2018?

They seem awfully anxious …

This is why the Democrats keep losing, Ian.

BINGO. With so much reporting about fake reporting you’d think the New York Times would maybe figure out that chatter doesn’t mean a whole lot.

In fact chatter could just be two snotty little aides sitting around a Starbucks bitching about Donald Trump over a soy pumpkin spice latte and talking smack on Twitter.

Granted, the NYT would likely still consider them a solid source but still.