Facts are an inconvenient thing when your whole agenda and movement is based on lies and emotional rhetoric.
So, according to reports, people are rioting because a violent repeat offender barred from legal carry approached cops brandishing a gun.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 23, 2016
Yup Dana, that’s it in a nutshell.
Apparently Mr. Scott was a violent repeat offender who approached a cop with a gun and somehow the officer responding the way he did was wrong because of Scott’s skin color.
Or at least that’s what the “protesters” seem to believe.
@DLoesch this is Obama's America. This is the legacy he has achieved after 8 years. A divided, angry country.
— Dan Wigton (@DanWigton) September 23, 2016
A legacy Obama is working OVERTIME to protect while promoting Hillary Clinton.
Democrats are weird.
.@DLoesch That seems to be the basics of it. @Cnn working overtime to bury that information.
— Lead and Gold (@leadandgold_cdh) September 23, 2016
CNN and every other Leftist media outlet who needs this story to be about racist cops for their ratings. Like we said before, facts are inconvenient things.
According to reports, Keith Lamont Scott was a violent repeat offender and prohibited possessor illegally carrying. https://t.co/ZW8Lv9qDft
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 23, 2016
Which means he shouldn’t have been legally able to possess a fire arm, let alone open carry.
Keith Lamont Scott's reported last record shows that he a repeat offender who, thanks to lenient sentencing, is released to offend again.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 23, 2016
One has to question why this man was on the streets, it wasn’t like he was arrested and convicted for marijuana or speeding tickets, we’re talking violent assault. This is the kind of person who should not have a gun and yet it seems the Left in their desperation to promote their odd agenda is pretending that Mr. Scott should have been protected via the Second Amendment.
It’s funny when the Left acts like they give a damn about the Constitution.
Are you telling me now that anti-gun types, progressives are arguing in FAVOR of prohibited possessors with violent records carrying guns?
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 23, 2016
Yup. That’s what we’re seeing … oh, and this happy horse manure.
In America, gun rights are for whites only – The Washington Post https://t.co/NFxMdtTsyi
— Eugene Robinson (@Eugene_Robinson) September 23, 2016
Gun rights are for all Americans unless they are felons which is THE LAW. You know, you gun control types are always pushing for common sense gun control and gosh, golly and gee, keeping guns from a violent felon is common sense gun control. It’s not a racial thing, if a white man had been convicted of violent assault and was brandishing a weapon while approaching a police officer he too would have met this same fate.
Scott is a reported violent offender barred from legal carry so will @Eugene_Robinson clarify if he's arguing in favor of him brandishing?
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 23, 2016
And why would Eugene be in favor of any person carrying illegally … interesting.
Hi, @Eugene_Robinson do u support restoring gun rights to repeat offenders whose violent records render them illegally barred from carrying?
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 23, 2016
At this point, Eugene has not answered Dana … anyone else not surprised?
