— The Hill (@thehill) December 5, 2016
So, that “news” broke over the weekend and it was evidently so important that the media had to have a breathless reporting frenzy about it.
— Us Weekly (@usweekly) December 5, 2016
Donald Trump: Trans woman who attacked president-elect in viral Twitter rant speaks out https://t.co/YFv3paCiy7
— Karen Kuhl (@karen_kuhl) December 6, 2016
— NBC OUT (@NBCOUT) December 4, 2016
Um. Dear Media: FAKE NEWS ALERT! Good grief. If every rando on Twitter, transgender “activist” or not, is giddily turned into viral news, it’s gonna be a very long four years.
Is this going to be the next four fucking years headline-wise https://t.co/ak4BIeAiy7
— Xmas Brock Samson ☭ (@refurbsexbot) December 5, 2016
Or eight years. Because media actions like that are truly paving the way for Trump’s second term already.
@thehill So viral that it requires every liberal media outlet to signal boost it before it ever got RT'd
— Ɍϵɖȷɑсқ Ɉϵɳ (@idrinkyourtears) December 5, 2016
Snort. But surely there must have been some news-worthy, Very Important Thoughts in the rando’s rant?
— FixAmericaFirst (@FAFPAC) December 5, 2016
@thehill Just read parts of it. Nothing enlightening, clever, or witty about it. My 9 year old grandson could do a better job.
— Dick Medary (@dick_medary) December 5, 2016
But she was Super Serious, You Guys (as Ace of Spades would say) and, thus, deserves a viral participation ribbon, right media? Plus, “resistance” or something. Remember, dissent is once again patriotic. Outside of the media bubble, however?
Trans man woman who attacked president-elect in viral Twitter rant speaks out.. and who really cares news corp. Trump won deal with it!!!
— Gold Coast Blog✨ (@GoldCoastBlog) December 6, 2016
Precisely. Give it a rest, you gigantic petulant babies.