Yep. As Twitchy reported, Debbie Wasserman Schultz was even more twisted than usual, which is saying a lot, in her remarks offering support for abortion in any circumstances. Sen. Rand Paul totally torched her with one response, when he nailed her with brutal truth: She would condone the killing of a 7 pound baby.

Monstrous.

Speaking of nailing, National Review’s Jonah Goldberg did just that with this question for the lapdogs in the media:

Exactly. But, you know, she has that (D) after her name and all.

That’s right. Remind us: Who are the extremists and the “fringe” again? Those who know that the Fourth Estate is dead aren’t holding their breath for, well, breathless coverage:

And here we go …

Yep. WaPo’s Chris Cillizza’s Twitter feed is all about, you guessed it … Rand Paul. Pathetic.

Curious that. Or, you know, totally expected. And why?

Ding, ding, ding!

Related:

It takes just this ONE crushing truth from Rand Paul to throttle twisted pro-abort Debbie Wasserman Schultz 

‘Seriously, this is monstrous’: Hey, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, is this Dems’officialabortion stance?

‘Myopic a**clowns’: Planned Parenthood cries sexism over Rand, lets slip the dogs of stupidity

Kirsten Powers: ‘I do not stand with Wendy Davis’; Blasts pro-abort fringe, media