Not shocking. What was shocking to the New York Time’s Nick Kristof? The fact that the new pope, Pope Francis I, is … Catholic.
He’s sad that the pope is traditional. Why, oh why, can’t the pope be a secular, pro-abortion “feminist” like “superb” Hillary Clinton?! Next, a fellow New York Times reporter started “wondering” how Pope Francis I was involved in Argentina’s Dirty War.
Mr. Kristof retweeted it, of course.
They are just “asking questions,” you see.
Evidence, shmevidence!
Standard operating procedure for lapdogs. Kristof continues whining.
Now he’s sad and fearful! Twitter users kindly try to teach him about Catholicism and, you know, reality.
https://twitter.com/scott_warden/status/311931901961187328
https://twitter.com/zescalan/status/311926900505317377
https://twitter.com/SMJanicze2/status/311928263213711361
Zing! It’s funny, because it’s true. Well, on the plus side, The New York Times is nothing if not predictable. So, there’s that.
Related:
New York Times’ Nick Kristof coos over ‘superb’ Hillary Clinton
Vile retweet by NYT’s Nick Kristof compares pro-Israel AIPAC to pigs
New York Times’ Nick Kristof trapped in Bahrain airport; Ben Affleck to the rescue
Nick Kristof thinks it’s funny to falsely insinuate that Romney hates Palestinians; Updated
Pearl-clutch: NYT’s Kristof “seriously troubled” by Romney’s Obamessiah oceans joke
Actress Dana Delany would like to exchange Francis for more liberal pope
