It must be good to be a Leftist influencer. They are always getting paid.
BREAKING: A new report reveals Mamdani’s office runs a Signal group of 200+ influencers, feeding them talking points and clips to amplify online.
— Eyal Yakoby (@EYakoby) September 2, 2026
Some received $5,000–$20,000 through taxpayer-funded contracts, with little disclosure.
This is taxpayer-funded propaganda. pic.twitter.com/WM2m1rsGve
So, it appears these large accounts with huge reach are just organically supporting him? Nope. Some of them are getting paid.
Mamdani is running taxpayer funded propaganda which is typical of communist regimes. https://t.co/Dj4P882JKr
— Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻 (@pepesgrandma) September 2, 2026
It's so on brand.
Color me shocked! https://t.co/135xxl9aJS
— Dean Cain (@Deancain) September 2, 2026
Am I in a Signal group with Mamdani? 👀 https://t.co/JaiikJPECv
— bitchuneedsoap (@uneedsoap) September 2, 2026
Probably.
You have no idea how much of what you see on X is real vs. propaganda! https://t.co/FFDOM75nOD
— Barry Cunningham (@barrycunningham) September 2, 2026
Absolutely.
They always do the same thing: an army of anon bots to harass and intimidate dissenters.
— Seneca Scott (@SenecaSpeaks21) September 2, 2026
Think of it like the new KKK, masked (anon), anti-black and genocidal.
Digital hoods have replaced white sheets. https://t.co/efICvPIqwI
Accurate.
Who’s on socialist Mayor Katie Wilson’s “friendly influencer” list in Seattle?
— Jonathan Choe (@choeshow) September 2, 2026
We all know she just cuts and pastes Mamdani’s media playbook. https://t.co/qv3EejtHOb
That's another good question.
There needs to be an investigation, FOIL requests to secure the messages and who was in the group, and consequences for this type of illegal taxpayer-backed propaganda campaign by the Mayor. https://t.co/l73OsBiL76
— EnforceNYC (@enforcelawsNYC) September 2, 2026
The thing is, it may not be illegal. It absolutely isn't ethical and the influencers should share if they are getting paid. Mamdani's office should share the list of influencers and what they've been paid.
Aren’t there laws preventing government resources from being used in campaigning @HarmeetKDhillon ? https://t.co/oPCGDqxbcr
— Dr. Naomi Wolf. 8 NYT Bestsellers. DPhil, Poetry. (@naomirwolf) September 2, 2026
They have probably marked it as 'marketing dollars'.
Not disclosing payment for editorial control over this content or a paid relationship violates 2 of the main FTC guidelines content creators have to follow…
— Roberto Blake 🇺🇸🇵🇦 Creative Entrepreneur (@robertoblake) September 2, 2026
You literally have to disclose gifted products in a video, sponsored payment or even affiliate links.
This is actually a… https://t.co/hcSDpAHHVr
There are laws about disclosing business relationships if influencers are selling products. It's not so clear about working with political candidates.
same people furious about Hegseth and influencers at the Pentagon are fine with this https://t.co/YrlHT7xsrB
— Daniel Greenfield - "Hang Together or Separately" (@Sultanknish) September 2, 2026
Something is going on. His reach does not correlate with the numbers.
— The Jewish Katniss (@themockingjew) September 2, 2026
He or the DSA or the terrorists who support him are abusing the algorithm.
100 ❤️
113 [ ]
269,800 views.
How’s that possible? https://t.co/7hXDMN2k2o
Oh, there are many shenanigans.