When will the IRS scandal get lapdogs drooling? Pat Sajak solves the puzzle

IRS hearings will get wider coverage when agency does something truly egregious, like closing a lane on a bridge.

— Pat Sajak (@patsajak) June 25, 2014

@patsajak LOL I know. I randomly switched to @MSNBC last night & about fell off my chair they were actually STILL talking about "Bridgegate"

— LYNN CAREY SAYLOR (@LynnCareySaylor) June 25, 2014

@hardball_chris lead story is some new convoluted Chris Christie bridge story (NJ) nothing on IRS. #biased #hack #leanforward @msnbc

— markb (@cubscoltsfan) June 24, 2014

@patsajak @beverlygrijalva And even then, ONLY IF that "something truly egregious" was done by a Republican.

— Sam Weaver (@veriphile) June 26, 2014

@patsajak @catoletters I'd like to believe that, Pat, but you know the media would spin it into "Hero IRS agent shuts down failing bridge."

— Elizabossy (@SpinsterBeth) June 26, 2014