Amazing: We had the same dream.

The New York Times fired Jill Abramson from her position as executive editor and the New York Times is on it … sort of:

The pesky questions about whether the oh-so-feminist Times paid Abramson less than her male predecessor and a male deputy managing editor are being covered elsewhere.

But don’t worry, guys. The sanctimonious NYT’s “editorial position is still pro-skirt.” Who ordered the schadenfreude stew with a side of giggles? Photoshopper @Slublog at your service:

Related:

‘War on women is coming from inside the house!’ John Ekdahl re-tweets NYT pay equity sanctimony

‘How great is this?!’ Jim Geraghty reminds NYT of headline they can re-use for Jill Abramson story

‘Pass the popcorn’: Jill Abramson reportedly discovered pay ‘considerably less’ than male predecessor

‘Need to follow some new people’: Jill Abramson’s NYT exit fills Twitter feeds with journo buzz