Amazing: We had the same dream.
The New York Times fired Jill Abramson from her position as executive editor and the New York Times is on it … sort of:
The New York Times Ousts Its Executive Editor, Elevating Second-in-Command http://t.co/cBgLRlBfXQ
— The New York Times (@nytimes) May 15, 2014
— Mary Katharine Ham (@mkhammer) May 15, 2014
The pesky questions about whether the oh-so-feminist Times paid Abramson less than her male predecessor and a male deputy managing editor are being covered elsewhere.
NYer's Auletta reports Abramson had attorney make 'polite inquiries" about pay differences… http://t.co/PewHD6pO7R
— Byron York (@ByronYork) May 15, 2014
Auletta: “She also found out that when she was managing editor, one of her deputies, John Geddes, made more money than she did.”
— Noah Rothman (@NoahCRothman) May 15, 2014
— Dylan Byers (@DylanByers) May 15, 2014
— Cuffy (@CuffyMeh) May 15, 2014
But don’t worry, guys. The sanctimonious NYT’s “editorial position is still pro-skirt.” Who ordered the schadenfreude stew with a side of giggles? Photoshopper @Slublog at your service:
BREAKING: Tomorrow’s NYT front page: pic.twitter.com/Vn82pMCEpb
— Peter Cook (@Slublog) May 15, 2014