Heh. Is there a better way to welcome Pat Sajak back to Twitter? We think not.
https://twitter.com/patsajak/status/362952899589963776
He’s back … and he’s verified.
https://twitter.com/patsajak/status/365161585418846209
https://twitter.com/patsajak/status/365212268406915072
Sajak on Twitter? Oh, this is gonna be good.
https://twitter.com/patsajak/status/365538055811112960
https://twitter.com/patsajak/status/365624699293671429
Of course, he could blame Obama, but what difference would it make?
https://twitter.com/patsajak/status/365625496106577920
Funny ’cause it’s true! Mr. Sajak, we hope you’re planning to follow James Woods.
For now, Sajak will stick with the ol’ “hackers” excuse.
@patsajak You cant go wrong with hackers.
— Rafael Brito (@sugarbroker) August 9, 2013
https://twitter.com/patsajak/status/365626057786802176
@patsajak pretty sure you've already made conservative comments. Those are career threatening themselves.
— Conversativism (@InTwittVeritas) August 9, 2013
https://twitter.com/patsajak/status/365692339487916032
Sajak has just under 2,000 followers. Time to fix that:
It's insanely criminal that pat motherhumpin @patsajak has less than 2K followers. Time for @greggutfeld to have him do #redeye….
— zoey (@zoeythegreat) August 9, 2013
Join the conversation as a VIP Member