<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>Twitchy</title><link>https://twitchy.com/jennqpublic-3135/2012/04/30/pornbots-okay-conservatives-not-so-much-time-for-twitter-to-explain/feed</link><description>Who Said What</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 21:28:18 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Pornbots okay, conservatives not so much? Time for Twitter to explain; Update: Suspended accounts reinstated?</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Pick any trending hashtag and you&amp;#8217;re likely to find a tsunami of scantily clad pornbots and default egg avatars cluttering the stream with pitches for Viagra and links to virus-laden sites.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 13:51:09 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Jenn Taylor]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/tw/images/up/2012/04/pornbot.jpg" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://twitchy.com/jenntaylor/2012/04/30/pornbots-okay-conservatives-not-so-much-time-for-twitter-to-explain-update-suspended-accounts-reinstated-n24833</link></item></channel></rss>