Debra Saunders, a conservative columnist for the San Francisco Chronicle, has posed a very interesting question that many Americans may be asking. If the same “consensus” that was unquestionably sure of a Hillary Clinton victory got that so wrong, how can a “consensus” of scientists be trusted when it comes to climate change?
If the overwhelming consensus was this wrong on 2016, why should voters accept it blindly on climate change?
— Debra J. Saunders (@debrajsaunders) November 13, 2016
The responses from the Left were immediate and unrestrained.
Stupid or trolling? https://t.co/WGG6AnS3h3
— Wil Wheaton (@wilw) November 13, 2016
— Steve Silberman (@stevesilberman) November 13, 2016
You can't be this stupid, ma'am. https://t.co/bnfx0hgA9J
— B! J! STEINER!!! (@DocZeus) November 13, 2016
— MEEZ (@TheRealBurmeez) November 13, 2016
The logic here is so incredibly dumb, I can't even find the words to argue against it https://t.co/KNy4EMIKC8
— wtf america? (@bart_smith) November 13, 2016
Do people have to practice to be this stupid, or is it one of those Mozart things where it's like taking dictation from an idiot god? https://t.co/h5JZBO9GWG
— Big Sexy Jeb Lund (@Mobute) November 13, 2016
They tend to get panicky when their cover is blown.