HAHAHA! Yes, New York Times, tell. Us. More:
Why Is Louis Farrakhan back in the news? https://t.co/6zTzXRveIr
— The New York Times (@nytimes) March 9, 2018
Boy, this is a real head-scratcher:
The so-called paper of record is baffled. https://t.co/WqFlsmFusA
— JWF (@JammieWF) March 9, 2018
Maybe because of this?
Because we had to shame you into covering a major story, basically https://t.co/G1nnMkQbOU
— Alex Griswold (@HashtagGriswold) March 9, 2018
This will help the Times readers out:
Roses are red
Farrakhan’s in the news
Because Dems cozy up
To a guy who hates Jewshttps://t.co/ymuytm5kSJ
— Will Piereson (@JWP1022) March 9, 2018
Well, at least the Times took a break from the Stormy Daniels coverage:
https://twitter.com/JenaMGreene/status/972213987797585920
***
Related:
AWKWARD! Sally Kohn defends Tamika Mallory and her Farrakhan-lovefest, trips EPICALLY over her OWN tweet https://t.co/Csb8zN8oQF
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) March 9, 2018
'You say a LOT of dumb sh*t.' Oliver Willis calls the 'Farrakhan thing' right-wing BS, gets KNOCKED out https://t.co/MB1fnX12DV
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) March 9, 2018
Pay ATTENTION Women's March –> NAACP President drops hammer on Farrakhan and his anti-Semitism https://t.co/3UKUa4kE1g
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) March 8, 2018