— New Republic (@NewRepublic) December 20, 2016
From the article:
The allegiance to the Clintons has always sat uncomfortably beside Media Matters’s ostensible goal of holding media accountable. Any journalist on Twitter knows that even mild criticisms of Clinton would almost instantaneously raise the hackles of some Media Matters staffer, giving the distinct impression that the whole project was about protecting Clinton from unflattering press rather than ensuring journalistic integrity.
Is anyone at all surprised by this? Pretty much, nope:
— Gabriel Malor (@gabrielmalor) December 20, 2016
Shocking, Not. https://t.co/sX5hirMNeL
— The Reagan Battalion (@ReaganBattalion) December 20, 2016
I find this hard to believe. https://t.co/JDwpfRZ2yC
— Alex Griswold (@HashtagGriswold) December 20, 2016
Media Matters had a different standard for the Clintons? YOU. DON'T SAY. https://t.co/94TrpireiZ
— Solo Death (@SoloDeath1) December 20, 2016
Maybe don’t put people who call Hillary Clinton a “white power” candidate on the defend Hillary Clinton beat, you know?
Oliver Willis officially JUMPS the shark; this shot / chaser about Trump and ‘white power’ proves it https://t.co/X6TQZfRYN5
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) November 28, 2016