Susan Sarandon Confronted for Claiming Oct 7th Atrocities/Rapes a Myth, Tries BOLTING But...
Team Biden Stomps on a Rake During Attempt to Mock Trump for Not...
BREAKING: Harvey Weinstein 2020 Rape Conviction OVERTURNED by NY's Highest Court and WTF
Weirdie Fixated on Barron Trump HUMILIATED for Whining About Trump's Team NOT Tipping...
POPCORN: Roseanne's Son Jake Pentland Defends His Mom and Hands Tom Arnold His...
Just When We Thought 'Drag Queen Story Hour' Couldn't POSSIBLY Get Any More...
Hillary Clinton Spreads Rachel Maddow's Story of Ending Lunch Breaks for Child Workers
Poll Shows the Democrat Base Is Unmarried Women
Squatter in Detroit Explains How She's Put a Lot of Work and Money...
WUT? Days After Gutting Title IX, Biden Says Trump Has Taken Women’s Rights...
In an Example of a Complete Lack of Self Awareness, Chris Christie...
New York Magazine Profiles Will Stancil, 'One of Politics Twitter's Most Inescapable Power...
DEADLY DEI: UCLA Med School Docs Say 'Obesity' Is a Slur, Weight Loss...
Biden Simp Harry Sisson Says Biden's Ban on TikTok Will Hurt Black-Owned Businesses
Prosecutors in Trump’s New York Trial Prove Their Witness Is a Lying 'Pecker'...

New spin from team Clinton: Emails were top secret, but totally 'innocuous,' so leave poor Hillary alone!

Hillary Clinton’s press secretary Brian Fallon share a new theory on the top secret emails found on her private server. They’re “top secret,” but “innocuous” so it’s no big deal:

Advertisement

So, who are the “officials” that decided the emails were “innocuous”? We don’t know, of course, because they won’t go on the record. And it wasn’t until the 11th paragraph that NBC got around to telling readers that the “officials” have an ax to grind:

The description of the emails as relatively innocuous came from officials, including a senior U.S. intelligence official, who believe Inspector General McCullough has been unfair to Clinton in his handling of the issue. They say McCullough and Congressional Republicans have elevated a mundane dispute about classification into a scandal.

They point out that McCullough, a career intelligence official, contributed $1,000 to George W. Bush’s 2004 presidential campaign.

“They” pointed out that McCullough was a Bush donor? “They” all decided to look that up themselves and tell NBC News the exact same thing when interviewed? Really?

Anyway, “innocuous” or not, it’s still a problem no matter how they spin it:

https://twitter.com/Jack0Spades/status/690163554398400512

Advertisement

And let’s not forget the potential conflict of interest thanks to Chelsea’s former employment at NBC:

https://twitter.com/RepublicanPunk/status/689954328245882880

NBC does have one on-the-record source for the piece — Brian Fallon, himself:

Clinton campaign spokesman Brian Fallon said the latest information about the emails makes it “absurd to suggest that Secretary Clinton did anything wrong.”

He added, “Both the sending and the leaking of [the IG’s] letter was a reckless and irresponsible act.”

If we were the skeptical type, we’d almost think that maybe Fallon was the guy who arranged for the “officials” to get interviewed by NBC in the first place.

***

Related:

Clinton camp’s Brian Fallon accuses Intel inspector general of conspiring with GOP

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos