Hillary Clinton Spreads Rachel Maddow's Story of Ending Lunch Breaks for Child Workers
Poll Shows the Democrat Base Is Unmarried Women
Squatter in Detroit Explains How She's Put a Lot of Work and Money...
WUT? Days After Gutting Title IX, Biden Says Trump Has Taken Women’s Rights...
In an Example of a Complete Lack of Self Awareness, Chris Christie...
New York Magazine Profiles Will Stancil, 'One of Politics Twitter's Most Inescapable Power...
DEADLY DEI: UCLA Med School Docs Say 'Obesity' Is a Slur, Weight Loss...
Biden Simp Harry Sisson Says Biden's Ban on TikTok Will Hurt Black-Owned Businesses
Prosecutors in Trump’s New York Trial Prove Their Witness is a Lying 'Pecker'...
Rep. AOC Wants to Know Where Are the Journalists on the Mass Graves...
'Redacting Reality': WH Transcript Runs Cover After Joe 'Ron Burgundy' Biden's Teleprompte...
FOX News: President Biden Forgives Violinist's $250,000 Student Loan
Paging Dr. Freud: Biden's Slip of the Tongue Is the MOST Honest Thing...
Try Not to Roll Your Eyes at the United Nations' New Ally in...
NYU Protester Describes the Ordeal of Her Arrest, Assumes Cops Are White Supremacists

New Obama campaign ad hammers Romney on education ... inaccurately

Such is the new attack on Mitt Romney’s “otherness.” Apparently tired of attacking him for being wealthy or allegedly paying low taxes, the Obama campaign is now targeting Romney with an ad that claims he said class sizes “don’t matter” in education. The ad then implies Romney cannot relate to the average person’s struggle to provide their children with a good education, and says he supports the Paul Ryan budget, “which could cut education by 20%.”

Advertisement

This ad should be withdrawn by the campaign for two reasons. First, looking at the Washington Times article the ad cites, Romney never said class sizes don’t matter. What he did say was that internationally-renowned schools have class sizes similar to those in America:

“In schools that are the highest-performing in the world, their classroom sizes are about the same as in the United States,” Mr. Romney said. “So it’s not the classroom size that’s driving the success of those school systems.”

Second, the ad’s assertion about the Ryan budget proposal is intellectually dishonest. Looking at the only report from the Center for Budget & Policy Priorities (CBPP) published on May 21, 2012 — which is cited as a source for this claim — nowhere is it stated that the Ryan budget would or could cut education spending. The policy paper from the liberal think tank  does say the Romney budget plan would cut education funding, but that is not what the Obama ad claims.

The Reuters article the ad cites from August 18 to bolster its point about the Paul Ryan education budget cuts? That’s untrue as well (emphasis added):

The plan crafted by Ryan, chairman of the House budget committee, calls for reductions of about 20 percent in non-defense discretionary spending.

If these cuts were distributed evenly across budget areas, the White House report said, it would mean reductions in federal grants that would eliminate funding for 38,000 teachers and aides and a further 27,000 special-education teachers.

Advertisement

Unfortunately, other liberals are jumping on the bandwagon started by the deceptive ad:

https://twitter.com/1GreatThinker/status/238289213307645952
https://twitter.com/cskies/status/238089724496064512

This ad wasn’t run by a Super PAC. It was run by Obama’s campaign. As President Obama says in the ad, “I’m Barack Obama, and I approved this message.” If he cared about the truth he would retract it.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement