NBC News Reports That President Biden Has Grown Angry About Re-Election Effort
The New Yorker Describes the 'Repressive, Authoritarian Soul' of 'Thomas the Tank Engine'...
Washington Post Writer Back With Another Hot Take on Whiteness and Country Radio
Color Us COMPLETELY Unsurprised: LAPD Task Force Created to Deal with Gangs of...
Media Matters Ari Drennen Plays Stupid, Claims You Need A DNA Test to...
New York Times Reports That 'Raunchy Christians' Are Turning Toward the Risqué
Best Economy Ever, Jack! More Americans Dip Into Retirement Savings to Make Ends...
Democrats Again Defending Dignity of MS-13 Gang Members
WATCH: Video of Nashville PD Physical Fitness Test Is MAJOR Cringe
Sen. Brian Schatz Tells Headline Writers How to Take Donald Trump Quote Out...
SHOCKING NEWS: New Study Reports Woke People Are Likely to Be Depressed and...
It's a Bloodbath (Hoax) Out There!
CNN Obviously Has No Problem With 'Bloodbath' When THEY Use the Word
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Concerned First Amendment Hamstrings Government
'Most Important SCOTUS Case of My Lifetime': Recap of Oral Arguments in Murthy...
Premium

USA Today has breaking biological news as Al Pacino's going to be a father again at 83

You might have heard by now that actor Al Pacino is reportedly going to be a father again at the age of 83:

Normally I don’t cover things that are usually more fitting for sites like TMZ, but the USA Today’s framing of the above story simply speaks volumes — none of them good — about how far “science” has fallen thanks to the new fad of denying reality:

Translation: Men and women are different (that’s actually controversial these days).

The latest inequity has been spotted:

At age 83, Al Pacino is about to have a baby with his 29-year-old girlfriend. Robert DeNiro, 79, recently welcomed his seventh child with a younger partner, too.

The actors are just two recent examples of older male celebrities having children with younger partners. And while those on the internet are debating the ethics of conceiving a child so late in life, their ages and age gaps with their partners also represent a frank truth that has long been felt by many: Women face a constantly ticking biological clock that impacts many facets of their lives, and men, simply, do not.

Pacino and DeNiro’s recent headline-making announcements might sting for some, making this inequity harder to ignore, experts say.

That’s a long way of saying this:

Can USA Today please define “woman”? Also according to the current “rules” couldn’t any women just identify as men and extend that biological clock? This is all so confusing.

Not as bad as USA Today’s chainsaw bayonet attachment take but it’s up there.
***

Related:

Greg Gutfeld shreds USA Today, the ‘propaganda arm for violent criminals’ everywhere

USA Today sports reporter DRAGGED for using LeBron to mock women fighting against men in their sports

USA TODAY shows us what life could be like in 2050 if the US embraces ‘green living’

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement