Lately former Obama ‚Äúgreen jobs‚ÄĚ adviser and current CNN analyst Van Jones has made some good points. Most recently Jones went on CNN and reminded the Democrats that they‚Äôre dialing the crazy up to a level that‚Äôs going to contribute to a midterm shellacking. However, Jones‚Äô take on the Supreme Court conservatives‚Äô rational for overturning of Roe v. Wade is next-level WTF:
This must be the most pro-death ‚Äúpro-life‚ÄĚ Supreme Court in history. More guns, more death penalty ‚ÄĒ and more babies? I guess with all the killing, we‚Äôre going to need more people? Is that the rationale? Just awful. #Roe #abortion
‚ÄĒ Van Jones (@VanJones68) June 24, 2022
What is this argument even? https://t.co/kFZeMgclFo
‚ÄĒ Kira (@RealKiraDavis) June 25, 2022
That tweet probably made more sense in his own head, which is where it should have stayed.
How is more babies "killing"? Where there are more guns, legally, there is less crime. WTH are you even taking about? https://t.co/bHymoN9YiH
‚ÄĒ Freedom is all that matters (@katnandu) June 25, 2022
The inside of a Democrat narrative is a strange, bizarre place.
It‚Äôs weird that the underlying, unspoken counter proposal in all these kinds of arguments is ‚Äúkill them babies!‚ÄĚ https://t.co/MxQ6IIjo1s
‚ÄĒ Fuzzy Chimp ūüáļūüáł (@fuzzychimpcom) June 25, 2022
Nothing in this idiotic tweet makes sense. I'm not even for a full on ban on abortions yet how does banning the killing of babies lead to more death? ūü§Ē https://t.co/q0AbYmr0v1
‚ÄĒ Alexi Kudej (@AKudej25) June 24, 2022
We‚Äôre as confused as everybody else.
‚ÄĒ Future southerner (@MazzoRay3) June 24, 2022
Or something like that maybe.
‚ÄĒ Austin Fiala (@austinfiala) June 25, 2022
The Left won‚Äôt come within a hundred miles of ‚Äúvery clear rationale‚ÄĚ on this (or anything else for that matter)
To change your comments display name, click here.