In a story about the latest revelations about where Huma Abedin’s email ended up (some of it classified), the New York Times unsurprisingly took a “Trump pounces” approach to the news that’s damning to Team Hillary:
President Trump returned to a familiar target in 2018, by attacking Clinton's top aide https://t.co/vRW8E4nRtY
— NYT Politics (@nytpolitics) January 2, 2018
So this is the headline your laughable newspaper is going with then? https://t.co/GyvAmKrwUu
— Kate A Rae (@IheartAlby) January 4, 2018
And the headline wasn’t the only laughable part of the Times’ story. James Woods pointed out what wasn’t mentioned:
Only the @nytimes could publish this story without mentioning that a) Abedin emailed a classified password, b) her husband is in prison, and c) she broke federal espionage laws. https://t.co/zlFR0ZG0MZ
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) January 3, 2018
Maybe it was thought the “Trump pounces” approach would have lost some of its punch if those things were mentioned.
Kind of some pretty important points don’t ya think??
— Del (@tovar_tovar5) January 3, 2018
They only report the part that fits their narrative
— MiriamMIA (@MiriamG216) January 3, 2018