As Twitchy has reported, an op-ed published in the New York Times garnered a lot of double-takes recently:
For all its flaws, the Communist revolution taught Chinese women to dream big https://t.co/Fci82iAPxM
— New York Times Opinion (@nytopinion) September 26, 2017
Garry Kasparov couldn’t believe it:
Horrible. I’m beginning to wonder who will rehabilitate Stalin first, Putin or the NY Times. https://t.co/xrPGyEkMKF https://t.co/xrPGyEkMKF
— Garry Kasparov (@Kasparov63) September 28, 2017
The Times is really on a roll these days.
For a surprisingly (and depressingly) large number of people, Stalin has never been in need of rehabilitation. https://t.co/oFR4rHCLc2
— Joel Engel (@joelengel) September 28, 2017
It's stunning that 100 years after the bloody Bolshevik revolution that so many naive American leftists still sanitize brutal dictatorships.
— Eric H. Roth (@compellingtalks) September 28, 2017
Has there been a more egregious effort to botox history than @nytimes effort to "tighten up" the communist narrative? https://t.co/YWL9D208pE
— Craig Fiebig (@fiebinator) September 28, 2017
***
Related:
MEEP! Iowahawk mocks NYT op-ed on ‘Socialism not sounding that bad’ with LEWD analogy
Join the conversation as a VIP Member