The Washington Post editorial board pleases liberals once in a while, but to be fair they can also serve up info that will anger the Left on occasion:
Opinion: Single-payer health care would have an astonishingly high price tag https://t.co/mEDJjuFxfH
— Washington Post (@washingtonpost) June 19, 2017
Democracy Dies In Darkness, friends. Anyway, here's our coverage of the Senate preparing to strip health care from tens of millions. pic.twitter.com/mQ385A4w8P
— David Roth (@david_j_roth) June 19, 2017
Well there’s something lefties won’t like about the WaPo:
How dare they report the fact that your rainbows and unicorns plans are unrealistic? https://t.co/vlfChoqELv
— neontaster (@neontaster) June 19, 2017
Hate it when reality intrudes on your Unicorn party. https://t.co/uacwDmvETn
— Archon (@The_Archon) June 19, 2017
The “reality” approach from the Post’s editorial board isn’t going over well with proponents of single-payer (to say the least):
Go put a big jar of marmalade up your ass
— rob delaney (@robdelaney) June 19, 2017
Searching for a similar editorial about how much invading and occupying Iraq might cost…hold this might take a while…
— Will 🐋 Menaker (@willmenaker) June 19, 2017
"were scum and dont REALLY care about humans,so we publish this idiotic article to sink neoliberalism deeper into baby boomers subconscious" https://t.co/tdslpzGYWF
— want not (@steeltippeddove) June 19, 2017
Other countries manage it just fine and so can we. But then the 1% just might have to pay their fair share of taxes. Sad
— Doren Maner (@DodieManer) June 19, 2017
newspaper owned by billionaire who grinds his workforce into dust explaining why you having health security is bad
— Josh Bayer (@bayer57) June 19, 2017
Did they have a character limit where they couldn't fit in "which would be worth it and still lower than costs in the current system?"
— Sʜᴀᴡɴ Dᴇᴡᴇʏ 🌹 (@ShawnLDewey) June 19, 2017
Sure late-starter disadvantage compared to the rest of the world which put into place many decades ago
— Banquo Dyar (@BanquoDyar) June 19, 2017
This is a reckless title and this article lacks nuance. Just taxing the rich would take care of so many problems here https://t.co/0TOJqlyaMB
— ɐılıs (@ShutupAilis) June 19, 2017
Wow this is astonishingly stupid https://t.co/HophHrYqbQ
— Chris Sinchok (@chrissinchok) June 19, 2017
Fun fact: market based healthcare is astonishingly HIGHER https://t.co/C11KGvdHTi
— steph mckay (@stephmckay1) June 19, 2017
Opinion: this is a shitty editorial https://t.co/6Px1K7TJhR
— logo, orbfended dad (@logophobe) June 19, 2017
Dying in the light. The WaPo Editorial Board is (a) numerically and fiscally stupid, or (b) dishonest. https://t.co/aWeZUGYwHv
— Scott Krein (@scottkrein) June 19, 2017
You know what has a higher price tag? Capitalist fuckery. https://t.co/aiahvOlILY
— #StillWithHerSlaves (@jaybeware) June 19, 2017
Shoddy accounting.
The price tag as a % of GDP goes down. Just gets picked up by gov/t through higher taxes on top brackets. https://t.co/KKRORouuz3
— Carl Corbynsen (@CarlOrkmansen) June 19, 2017
Is this what "journalism" is called nowadays in America? Pure opinion based crockshit? #MakeJournalismHaveIntegrityAgain https://t.co/sHgGhBk3ke
— Daniel Garal 🇦🇺 (@garaldaniel) June 19, 2017
Well yeah but here's a mind blowing idea: you pay for it by taxing rich people and not spending billions bombing people.
— Aestival Fae Child ☭ (@mysticfaechild) June 19, 2017
