Hillary Clinton’s 2016 election loss is still being debated in some circles. Former Obama staffer Tommy Vietor and MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough tried to piece together a multi-state puzzle:
Has anyone written a good analysis of why HRC lost PA? You can argue strategic errors for not visiting WI and MI, but PA was hard fought.
— Tommy Vietor (@TVietor08) May 11, 2017
HRC could have won WI and MI with a little effort. But 6 months later it is still hard to explain PA and FL. https://t.co/TwzLXKHqNk
— Joe Scarborough (@JoeNBC) May 12, 2017
Why did Hillary lose those states? Maybe it’s this simple:
Explanation: She's Hillary Clinton. https://t.co/uA5dza3ViM
— Jim Treacher (@jtLOL) May 12, 2017
OOF!
@JoeNBC Really Joe? No she couldn't have. Americans didn't want/trust her. We were sick of her lies, condescending attitude & incompetence
— MissEMT (@MissEMT37) May 12, 2017
TO: @TVietor08
FROM: America
RE: Why HRC lost PA
DATE: 5/12/2017
________Hillary was the least likable candidate in modern history. https://t.co/AghyrX7UIZ
— Arthur Schwartz (@ArthurSchwartz) May 12, 2017
She was a horrible candidate….so there's that. https://t.co/SvgfswphUA
— P Henry Martin (@PHenryMartin) May 12, 2017
@JoeNBC People didn't like her. Mystery solved.
— Wes Ganobcik (@ganobleberries) May 12, 2017
@JoeNBC She lost because she is not a likable candidate. She is untrustworthy
— John Bowling (@johnmissib) May 12, 2017
