As we reported earlier, Hillary Clinton didn’t wait very long before commenting on the officer-involved shooting Keith Lamont Scott in Charlotte, N.C.
Keith Lamont Scott. Terence Crutcher. Too many others. This has got to end. -H
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) September 21, 2016
Was Clinton’s comment made way too soon?
You don’t think it’s prudent to wait for the investigations to be concluded before politicizing this? https://t.co/TmdL9LxFi3
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 21, 2016
There are, of course, certain times when Clinton thinks it’s inappropriate to comment right away, such as after a terrorist attack:
"I think it's always wiser to wait until you have information before making conclusions, because we are just in the beginning stages…" – H https://t.co/EAtt8vVjgQ
— Ben Taylor (@taylorben) September 21, 2016
Those words, delivered just a few days ago, only apply if it’s something that goes against the Dem narrative, apparently.
Hey media, remember when you were all "how dare a candidate speak before the investigation is done?" All the way back on Saturday? https://t.co/fM3FRjShYz
— Renna (@RennaW) September 21, 2016
A wise woman once said "Its better to wait until all the facts are in" ?
(by "once" I mean 4 days ago) https://t.co/BjqavkiJDK
— Steph (@steph93065) September 21, 2016
@HillaryClinton Good to see that for you, facts don't matter. Nice job.
— Chris Tsotsoros (@ctsotsoros) September 21, 2016
— Shane Styles (@shaner5000) September 21, 2016
@DLoesch you only need further investigation if it's an ~explosion~…?
— ObiWanGOP (@ObiWanGOP) September 21, 2016
— Shaun McDonnell (@McShauno) September 21, 2016
Fact check: True.