This endorsement was probably written years ago:
— The New York Times (@nytimes) January 30, 2016
Stunning! Except not really. But look how the NYT editorial board described her:
— Alexis Keslinke (@alexis_keslinke) January 30, 2016
"Mrs. Clinton has done her homework on pretty much any subject you’d care to name." https://t.co/30HllUNkP8
— Hq (@hernan__q) January 30, 2016
What color is the sky in the NYT editorial board’s world?
Pravda couldn't have glossed over the Clinton Crime Family better. https://t.co/HKcbgo2u7d
— Diana West (@diana_west_) January 30, 2016
Crooked always has friends in high places. https://t.co/xfM99jqo1S
— JG (@JohnG405) January 30, 2016
We already knew. https://t.co/Zg771r4kb4
— Hair (@SHannitysHair) January 30, 2016
— Richard Robbins (@rich1) January 30, 2016
All the news that's fit to be predictable https://t.co/plqVrDfEEL
— Natt การุณรังษีวงศ์ (@nattgarun) January 30, 2016
Bwahahahaha!!! Hope you have a back-up plan! https://t.co/n41UyRbJMh
— Andy Waters (@NoSurrender357) January 30, 2016
— Smittie (@smittie61984) January 30, 2016
— Blame Big Government (@BlameBigGovt) January 30, 2016
Gee, we wonder who the Times will endorse in the general election. The suspense is killing us!
— Cliff Ricci (@cliffricci) January 30, 2016
If that were to happen the Times would probably post her bail if necessary.