https://twitter.com/TuPadreDice/status/663901212337700864
In February of this year, a federal judge in Texas ruled in favor Gov. Greg Abbott after Texas governor challenged President Obama’s executive amnesty.
On Monday the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the ruling that Obama’s amnesty push is unconstitutional, but here’s how the Associated Press framed it:
BREAKING: Appeals court rules against Obama's plan to protect about 5 million people from deportation.
— The Associated Press (@AP) November 10, 2015
Well, that’s one way to put it.
@AP I think you meant "Appeals court rules against Obama 's plan to refuse to see that the laws are executed."
— Poor Substitute (@psforpublius) November 10, 2015
The AP tweet sounds like it could have been written by Josh Earnest.
That's one way to put it. Another is to note the president is obliged to enforce immigration law. Interesting choice https://t.co/mUkCaEkgvp
— Noah Rothman (@NoahCRothman) November 10, 2015
Or: "Appeals court rules against Obama's plan to circumvent the rule of law." #journalism https://t.co/Y0LpRWpD1k
— McLizbuddie (@lizbuddie) November 10, 2015
Gee…I wonder where the @AP stands on the subject of immigration..https://t.co/AFH5vQanxY
— TracyJeffords (@TracyJeffords) November 10, 2015
MT @AP This ruling is more evidence that we don't deserve a President as caring and wonderful as Obama. https://t.co/BNhhC0NrfA
— John DeWitt (@Shanghaibeast) November 10, 2015
Uh, don't you mean Obama's plan to register 5 million illegals as democrats? https://t.co/hiLzsV9hz1
— DonnaTheOne&OnlyOne (@izzyjsmom) November 10, 2015
@TracyJeffords @AP @instapundit You misspelled "Court votes to uphold Constitution and reject President's extrajudicial actions"
— Zarba (@JoeBeckner) November 10, 2015
I wasn't aware it was the job of the government to "protect" people from the consequences of breaking the law. https://t.co/7DkNf26E6M
— Drew McCoy (@DrewMTips) November 10, 2015
***
Related:
‘So much for a nation of laws’: Obama’s statement on amnesty stuns
