National political correspondent for the Washington Post, Karen Tumulty, asked a question almost everybody already knows the answer to:
Do the Clintons have an ethical blind spot when it comes to their donors? http://t.co/cZgNpMg6aA
— Karen Tumulty (@ktumulty) April 23, 2015
Really? Ha!
.@ktumulty asks if the Clintons have ethical blindspots. LOLOLOL. YES, Karen. They do. http://t.co/GuzfIRYdR8
— RBe (@RBPundit) April 23, 2015
Yep. That's how Clintons earned over $100 million. #wishicouldbedeadbroketoo https://t.co/3gtPGzL6aA
— Maddie (@maddiethinks) April 23, 2015
@ktumulty By the way, you learned nothing from the '90s scandal mongering. Be gone!
— Ralph Baldwin (@ralphb47) April 23, 2015
Actually, there wasn’t even a need for a qualifier in her question:
The Clintons have an ethical blind spot overall; Monicagate proved that. @ktumulty
— Matt Maggio (@MaggioMatt) April 23, 2015
https://twitter.com/fairflattaxnow/status/591340275726954496
Actually, they don't have any ethics at all.
— Beebo (@beebobaby) April 23, 2015
We hope this helped answer the question.
***
Related:
Not just uranium. The Clinton Foundation has a tax return problem, too
Join the conversation as a VIP Member