John McCormack, staff writer for The Weekly Standard, tweeted some Journolist flashbacks in case you’ve forgotten:
@daveweigel Also, Spencer Ackerman trying to coordinate a smear campaign against conservatives by calling them racist http://t.co/TFoAKclRmX
— John McCormack (@McCormackJohn) June 21, 2013
"Pick one of Obama’s conservative critics, Ackerman wrote, 'Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares—and call them racists'" http://t.co/Cf8C9zVgf6
— John McCormack (@McCormackJohn) June 21, 2013
"What is necessary is to raise the cost on the right of going after the left." http://t.co/JYnmCutTFp
— John McCormack (@McCormackJohn) June 21, 2013
"find a rightwinger’s [sic] and smash it through a plate-glass window." http://t.co/JYnmCutTFp
— John McCormack (@McCormackJohn) June 21, 2013
Tweeters have noted that it’s highly unlikely what Gawker released is the entire Journolist archive:
@seanmdav Don't think they've posted the entire archive yet. Say they're currently working on posting but gives link. They shld have waited.
— Jessica Heddings (@JessicaHeddings) June 21, 2013
There is no way the complete Journolist Archive is online. There are only 265 documents in that uploaded archive, about 100 emails.
— Joe Brooks (@joebrooks) June 21, 2013
Read through the Journolist archive published by Gawker. This is not the complete archive. Nothing much there that hasn't been seen before.
— John Sexton (@verumserum) June 21, 2013
One thing everybody can agree on: A great deal of what has been released seems to be HTML code:
OMG, this Journolist thing was worse than I thought! They spoke in some sort of secret code! pic.twitter.com/5U9LfKrTpF
— Alex Parker (@AlexParkerDC) June 21, 2013
That journolist thing is unreadable.
— Jeremy Stahl (@JeremyStahl) June 21, 2013
Here’s the idea of the day:
https://twitter.com/FilmLadd/status/348094565598756865
Join the conversation as a VIP Member