No more mean tweets, right?
Here’s a curious note from a March 6, 2017 FBI briefing that was just released as part of the Michael Sussman case. As you might recall, Sussman was a Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer who was indicted last September for peddling obviously false information to the FBI about the Trump Organization having a covert server linked to the Russian Alfa Bank.
Here’s a short thread by Hans Mahncke that highlights one handwritten line from that FBI briefing: “FBI trying to determine what is behind POTUS tweets.”
By March 2017 the world's "premier" law enforcement agency knew:
-that Hilary had a plan to vilify Trump with Russia collusion
-that Steele lied
-that Danchenko lied
-that the Alfa Bank data was fakeSo what did they do?
"FBI trying to determine what is behind POTUS tweets." pic.twitter.com/K7ZP5758o3
— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) May 9, 2022
This is from Mary McCord's notes of a March 2017 FBI briefing that was just released in the Sussmann case. McCord is a former DOJ official and all out anti-Trump Resistance operative.https://t.co/LLxEbCE4WK
— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) May 9, 2022
Knew about it? They were in on it. HRC's installation was supposed to be a sure thing.
— Nathan Blue (@NathanBluBlue) May 9, 2022
All this is correct and the special counsel appointment was simply to whitewash what they were up to. It becomes ever more disgraceful the more we learn.
— Drew Hawk (@WeGotOneBich) May 9, 2022
Said another way, the FBI was less concerned about the obvious Clinton operation than the fact that Trump appeared to have figured it out.
— DPow (@DPBeachNY) May 9, 2022
…which tells us everything we needed to know about the FBIs motive & affiliation.
— wolfpack (@AgramSeth) May 9, 2022
But our new Minister of Truth Nina Jankowicz tweeted that the FBI and Justice Department were obviously biased against Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election.
And none of this was touched in the Mueller investigation
— Jim Muessig (@JimMuessig) May 9, 2022
"Weissman investigation"
(FIFY)
— OneFlewOver_USA (@OneFlewOver_USA) May 9, 2022
To be fair, after thousands of hours of investigation time and millions of dollars, the FBI did arrive at a conclusion:
Trumps tweets were mean.— Magnus Döngle (@texas_chzhead) May 9, 2022
Absolutely flabbergasting.
— Lydia Leitermann 💐 (@sourpatchlyds) May 9, 2022
Another criminal who will get away with everything he did. Why is justice so double souled? Why is equality before the law and indeed the rule of law itself near extinction in modern America? Because the DOJ and FBI HQs are full of such scheming political hacks as Strzok.
— Publius Maximus (@MaximusPublius) May 9, 2022
We should remove treason as a punishable offence from the constitution. It hasn't mattered to our government since George Washington was leading our army.
— Eddie (@TrumpSouperman) May 9, 2022
Lol, the lefties don't understand actual support from The People.
"How did he win if we didn't help him by cheating?" lmao.
— GuataWife (@GuataWife) May 9, 2022
It’s a relief to know the FBI was keeping briefed on President Trump’s tweets. This is almost as important as Brian Stelter’s critical work analyzing Trump’s Twitter typos and why they were important.
Related:
‘Russiagate in a nutshell’: Glenn Greenwald sums up the latest on John Durham’s investigation, pulls Hillary Clinton’s old tweet about Trump’s ‘covert server’ https://t.co/xqJBbpce2m
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) September 16, 2021
