Add “Republican strategist” Ana Navarro to the list of people opposing the confirmation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. And she thinks she has compiled a list of people and organizations who aren’t liberal but still oppose Kavanaugh, so he’s got to be a bad choice, right?
-The Catholic Journal
-The largest organization of Christian churches
-Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens
all have in common?
They all think Kavanaugh should not be on the Supreme Court.
None of them are Liberals.
None of them are pro Roe v Wade.
— Ana Navarro (@ananavarro) October 4, 2018
A lot of people seemed to think she should check her work, though.
What's horrible is that you KNOW this is untrue—and you know your followers are too stupid to *know* it's untrue.
And you're taking advantage of them.
— Lyndsey Fifield (@lyndseyfifield) October 4, 2018
And all of them are wrong. https://t.co/vaQWgBrj0q
— alexandriabrown (@alexthechick) October 4, 2018
I’m not particularly surprised that Navarro is confused about what is conservative and liberal. https://t.co/GcA8lYUTy7
— Stewart Bratcher (@Bratcherfirm) October 4, 2018
Narrator: they are all liberals https://t.co/lVuHOqqpCI
— Sigh-tama (@jewfulnoise) October 4, 2018
Literally all three of these are liberal https://t.co/H5iKEHyBOZ
— Alex "Squee" Griswold (@HashtagGriswold) October 4, 2018
They are all far leftwing activists.
— David "Beto" Blackmon (@GDBlackmon) October 4, 2018
Literally all of these are liberal. https://t.co/PjWi2FEeir
— Sagacious Guy (@RealSagacity) October 4, 2018
I hate to break it to you but they are all liberal https://t.co/VAMVwEFcRo
— Herk Driver, Overhead Keg Press Champion (@G130J) October 4, 2018
Aside from not wanting Kavanaugh confirmed, every other claim in this tweet is untrue. It’s actually impressive how bad this is. https://t.co/sJwCmNNY0O
— Brad Pritts (@BradleyPritts) October 4, 2018
Truth is fiction and lies are truth.
What a twisted morality we now have in USA.
FWIW, all 3 are liberal AND 2/3 are pro-abortion. https://t.co/kZdvcNS5j8
— Nate Bell (@NateBell4AR) October 4, 2018
I don't get people like this. She's either ignorant to an absolutely baffling degree or as blatant a grifter as you'll ever see. Either way, why would anyone take her seriously as a pundit? https://t.co/PennWiJNkV
— Frank J. Fleming (@IMAO_) October 4, 2018
1. I think she means "America", which is a left-wing "catholic journal", not "The Catholic Journal".
2. She's talking about the National Council of Churches, which is left-wing.
3. And John Paul Stevens? Really?
— JavelinaBomb (@javelinabomb) October 4, 2018
I don’t know what The Catholic Journal is (is that America Magazine?) but John Paul Stevens is absolutely a pro-choice liberal https://t.co/QaVh2K98zs
— Will Rahn (@willrahn) October 4, 2018
— Mike Sacks (@MikeSacksEsq) October 4, 2018
Umm…Justice Stevens in Casey said “Roe is an integral part of a correct understanding of both the concept of liberty and the basic equality of men and women,” but you’re making a list, so you do you, I guess. https://t.co/X5RvyYhvwm
— Brandon A. Blake (@brandonblake) October 4, 2018
John Paul Stevens literally voted to uphold Roe v Wade while a SCOTUS justice. Will CNN do something about their fake news problem ? https://t.co/fJbG0Xzdnv
— 📊 👨💻 🕵️🗯️🤖🧐 (@k1ug3) October 4, 2018
Tell me dear, how did Justice Stevens vote in Planned Parenthood v. Casey? https://t.co/QdmKhI5OTY
— James Davis (@jamesedavis2012) October 4, 2018
See, again this is dragging Stevens name in some disgusting ways. He consistently voted to uphold Roe V Wade his entire career. https://t.co/KCm4N9hai0
— Bernard Lomax (@BernieLomaxCEO) October 4, 2018
John Paul Steven wrote an op-ed specifically calling for the repeal of the second amendment. He’s as leftist as they come. https://t.co/F9BGVJTT10
— Sal Nuzzo (@salnuzzo) October 4, 2018
John Paul Stevens isn't a liberal? He's as conservative as Chuck Schumer. https://t.co/MYUc8fftiB
— Martin Puente (@Martinbridge) October 4, 2018
Wow, turns out John Paul Stevens was a pro-life conservative who accidentally voted to uphold Roe v. Wade like a hundred times over 34 years. https://t.co/fmINJ9iQjh
— CatholicVote.org (@CatholicVote) October 4, 2018
TIL former Justice Stevens is not for Roe. Big scoop. https://t.co/Um5A9Bl9Uk
— Ramesh Ponnuru (@RameshPonnuru) October 4, 2018
John Paul Stevens and the National Council of Christian Churches are both very liberal and very pro-Roe. https://t.co/89W3ixu8Bg
— Lukas Petersen (@LUKABUS89) October 4, 2018
The National Council of Churches is against him because they're pro-abortion. https://t.co/Ixu4I6aC0z
— P.C. Outsider (@PhilOutsider) October 4, 2018
Guys, the National Council of Churches is not non-partisan and it's not evangelical.
When Bill Clinton stood accused, they called for forgiveness (even before he admitted guilt).
Do your f*king research you morons.
— PoliMath (@politicalmath) October 4, 2018
It’s also not Christian. https://t.co/1e0QuBK2gj
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) October 4, 2018
I have seen dozens of *reporters* tweet that John Paul Stevens is a conservative and act like the National Council of Churches calling for Kavanaugh to step down is big unexpected news.
They don't even Google this shit, it's really exhausting.
— PoliMath (@politicalmath) October 4, 2018
Did you really just bring up the Catholic Journal? Did you really just go there?
— @Ralph_P3Electric (@RalphP3Electric) October 4, 2018
I am a Catholic journalist; editor of a large Catholic news agency. Catholicism in media is what I do for a living. I have never heard of The Catholic Journal.
Whatever you think of Kavanaugh, don't imagine that "The Catholic Journal" is an official or mainstream publication. https://t.co/1DuHbzCREw
— JD Flynn (@jdflynn) October 4, 2018
Please correct this. The Catholic Journal is NOT a mainstream journal. https://t.co/QxxnawoIQE
— Jennifer Bullock (@realjbullock) October 4, 2018
-“The Catholic Journal” is a tiny blog.
-“The largest organization of Christian churches” — the National Council of Churches — is liberal, unlike what you claim.
-Former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens is liberal, unlike what you claim.
But um besides that great Tweet.👍 https://t.co/WD6K1U23CL
— Jerry Dunleavy (@JerryDunleavy) October 4, 2018
This person actually gets paid by CNN to give her ignorant opinions to other people.
Do you even know who John Paul Stevens is?
He wrote and joined in quite a few opinions reaffirming Roe v. Wade. https://t.co/KoB2RANOMH
— (((AG))) (@AG_Conservative) October 4, 2018
This might be the single most idiotic tweet I have seen in a particularly idiotic month on a particularly idiotic platform. https://t.co/Rl2q8abjq1
— Brendan Dunn (@brendanmdunn) October 4, 2018
But there’s no way Kavanaugh can be confirmed now, not with that list floating out there.
Straightforward from here! Jennifer Rubin’s transformation into Dems’ ‘official spox chick’ is just about complete https://t.co/nAQ9ZnpbzL
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) October 4, 2018