Wow, Hillary Clinton really is the most qualified candidate for president ever. Even though she pinned the WikiLeaks document dumps on Vladimir Putin and his puppet Donald Trump during the third and final debate, she’s confident she can strike a deal with the Russians to save Syria from their aggression.
— Bahman Kalbasi (@BahmanKalbasi) October 20, 2016
— Ben Swann (@BenSwann_) October 20, 2016
That’s great news coming on the heels of the current administration’s hot streak with striking deals, ranging all the way from Bowe Bergdahl to the Iran nuclear deal to that totally coincidental passing in the night of hostages and a pallet of cash.
How is Hillary going to strike a deal with the Russians when she keeps blaming them for her mistakes?
— Aaron Gilman (@Gillybertarian) October 20, 2016
— Brian (@xtriadx) October 20, 2016
She’s going to present them with the biggest, the classiest reset button, made by union workers in America with American steel.
Hillary says we could strike a deal with Russia and Syria..how's that been working for you, Obama and Kerry so far. You're incompetent
— American Mother (@lamourpourlavie) October 20, 2016
Really, Hillary is going to strike a deal with Russia to create a no fly zone in Syria. Pure fantasy. Never going to happen. Lie. #debate.
— Mark Garcia (@Lacodia) October 20, 2016
She’d already pivoted to Russia once in search of a debate bailout, but those pesky document dumps, courtesy of Russia, just keep coming back to land on her forehead. She’s for a no-fly zone now?
— CBS News (@CBSNews) October 20, 2016
— Abby Martin (@AbbyMartin) October 20, 2016
— Tim Pool (@Timcast) October 20, 2016
Hillary to Goldman Sachs 6/4/2013: No-fly zone in Syria would require killing lots of civilians. pic.twitter.com/EKT1GR2mNW
— Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) October 15, 2016
Clinton said that a Syrian no-fly zone would kill endless amount of people in her wall street speeches, but now it would protect them?
— Stefan Molyneux (@StefanMolyneux) October 20, 2016
She’s just that qualified.
Nobody seems to care about Hillary's plan to create a no-fly zone over Syria, which would require killing thousands of innocent civilians.
— Jack Kleese (@jack_kleese) October 20, 2016
Implementing a no-fly zone in Syria would require a MINIMUM of 10,000 troops on the ground.
Not to mention potential war with Russia.
— Bryce Adkins (@BigAdkins) October 20, 2016
Last time HRC advocated a "no-fly zone," Gen. Keane emailed her to say the term "misrepresents what we are actually doing" — regime change pic.twitter.com/8eZsKFy1wV
— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) October 19, 2016
Hillary Clinton's proposal of a no-fly zone is incredibly reckless & will ultimately lead to war with Russia. This is NOT acceptable #debate
— Ajamu Baraka (@ajamubaraka) October 20, 2016
we’re gonna impose a no fly zone, we’re gonna build a giant flyswatter, the best flyswatter, you’ve never seen, this, it’s good, the best
— Shane (@scyrx) October 20, 2016
HRC once again evades the question on complications that could result from a no-fly zone. She's dodged questions all night. #debate
— Stephen Hayes (@stephenfhayes) October 20, 2016
Good good question about a No Fly Zone.
— Christopher Hayes (@chrislhayes) October 20, 2016
hey an actual question on a no fly zone that addresses what it entails
— Adam H. Johnson (@adamjohnsonNYC) October 20, 2016
Good follow-up q from CW to Hillary on how her no-fly zone over Syria would work & whether she'd shoot down planes.
NO answer. #debate
— Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) October 20, 2016
It took three debates for a moderator to have the curiosity to ask about Clinton's No Fly Zone vis-a-vis a war with Russia. Wonder why.
— The Dishonorable DJT (@AceofSpadesHQ) October 20, 2016
No-fly zones are war. Hillary can deny that, but it's true. https://t.co/7DnBO9U5Nt
— Tim Carney (@TPCarney) October 20, 2016
A lot of former Sanders supporters are really going to be feeling the burn over that particular non-answer.
Well done to Chris Wallace for probing the implications of HRC's cataclysmic position on the "No-Fly Zone," which both Obama & Trump oppose
— Michael Tracey (@mtracey) October 20, 2016
Imposing a no fly zone in syria could trigger a conflict with russia, but critics say the alternative is watching the slaughter. #debate
— Richard Engel (@RichardEngel) October 20, 2016
And that’s different from what the administration is currently doing … how? Will Hillary’s red lines be that much brighter than Obama’s? Solar powered?