Here's What the Biden WH Is Touting As 'Campaign Rallies' (Beverage Warning)
YIKES: Leaked Video Shows Biden's 'Spontaneous' WaWa Visit Was Scripted DOWN to Cashier's...
*SNORT* Nancy Pelosi's Book Release Announced and Twitter Has SO Much Fun (at...
For Once I Actually Believe Something Biden Said (There's a First Time for...
We Can Take a Guess: Israel Unsure Why Pentagon Leaked Info on Iran...
Hawley Lights a Fire Under Mayorkas, Leaves Him Sweating After Fiery Exchange
Riley Gaines Calls Biden Out for 'Officially Abolishing Title IX As We Know...
AOC RAGES at Barnard and Columbia for Suspending Pro-Hamas Protesters and X Just...
*EYE ROLL* Sheldon Whitehouse DRAGGED for Thread Defending Dems Rejecting Mayorkas Impeach...
WH Adviser Says Biden Will Make Sure Gas Prices 'Remain Affordable' (Yeah, About...
Rand Paul Rips Mayorkas to Shreds During Tense Questioning
Oh Honey, NO: Joy Behar Tries to Claim That Biden Cares MORE About...
Meet the Canadian Katherine Maher: Head of CBC Is EXACTLY As Deranged a...
Monopoly on DERP: Elizabeth Warren Sounds Off on Apple iPhone and Gets Blasted
Protesters Say Dexter Reed Was Shot, Assassinated, and Overly-Killed

WaPo fact checker rates Obama's red line comment a 'bungled talking point'

“I didn’t set a red line” was the statement up for review Friday by Washington Post fact checker Glenn Kessler. Easily obtainable videos show President Obama clearly setting that red line, so this is obviously a four-Pinnochio statement, right? Let’s say three, just to account for the Washington Post’s obvious bias. What’s that? Kessler gave the comment “no rating”?

Advertisement

Kessler’s logic? Obama’s original threat of a red line in Syria was “an ill-considered rhetorical statement,” and the president “bungled the language again” when he attempted to walk back his words. Kessler’s conclusion is this: “We don’t try to play gotcha here at The Fact Checker, so we are inclined to leave this question to our readers. Some may find the president’s apparent discomfort with his own words more meaningful than any potential misstatement.”

Got that? Claiming that he never set a red line is not a lie but a “potential” misstatement, and the president certainly feels bad about it, and isn’t that what’s important?

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/375956261658820612

It wouldn’t be fair to judge the president on a misstatement; eventually we’ll let him be clear, and then we can judge.

Advertisement

Advertisement

That’s some concession. He could have given a blatant lie two Pinocchios, but didn’t want to “play gotcha.”

https://twitter.com/OrwellForce/status/376004813303336960

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement